Literature DB >> 18056665

Professionalism in medicine: results of a national survey of physicians.

Eric G Campbell1, Susan Regan, Russell L Gruen, Timothy G Ferris, Sowmya R Rao, Paul D Cleary, David Blumenthal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prospect of improving care through increasing professionalism has been gaining momentum among physician organizations. Although there have been efforts to define and promote professionalism, few data are available on physician attitudes toward and conformance with professional norms.
OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the extent to which practicing physicians agree with and act consistently with norms of professionalism.
DESIGN: National survey using a stratified random sample.
SETTING: Medical care in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: 3504 practicing physicians in internal medicine, family practice, pediatrics, surgery, anesthesiology, and cardiology. MEASUREMENTS: Attitudes and behaviors were assessed by using indicators for each domain of professionalism developed by the American College of Physicians and the American Board of Internal Medicine. Of the eligible sampled physicians, 1662 responded, yielding a 58% weighted response rate (adjusting for noneligible physicians).
RESULTS: Ninety percent or more of the respondents agreed with specific statements about principles of fair distribution of finite resources, improving access to and quality of care, managing conflicts of interest, and professional self-regulation. Twenty-four percent disagreed that periodic recertification was desirable. Physician behavior did not always reflect the standards they endorsed. For example, although 96% of respondents agreed that physicians should report impaired or incompetent colleagues to relevant authorities, 45% of respondents who encountered such colleagues had not reported them. LIMITATIONS: Our measures of behavior did not capture all activities that may reflect on the norms in question. Furthermore, behaviors were self-reported, and the results may not be generalizable to physicians in specialties not included in the study.
CONCLUSION: Physicians agreed with standards of professional behavior promulgated by professional societies. Reported behavior, however, did not always conform to those norms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18056665     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-11-200712040-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  40 in total

1.  The elusive connection between health care spending and quality.

Authors:  Jonathan Skinner; Amitabh Chandra; David Goodman; Elliott S Fisher
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Rethinking medical professionalism: the role of information technology and practice innovations.

Authors:  David Mechanic
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Holiday review. Snappy answers to stupid questions: an evidence-based framework for responding to peer-review feedback.

Authors:  Daniel Rosenfield; Steven J Hoffman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Promise of professionalism: personal mission statements among a national cohort of medical students.

Authors:  Michael W Rabow; Judith Wrubel; Rachel Naomi Remen
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  The price of false beliefs: unrealistic expectations as a contributor to the health care crisis.

Authors:  Steven H Woolf
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Does gender moderate medical students' assessments of unprofessional behavior?

Authors:  Terry D Stratton; Rosemarie L Conigliaro
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Changing interactions between physician trainees and the pharmaceutical industry: a national survey.

Authors:  Kirsten E Austad; Jerry Avorn; Jessica M Franklin; Mary K Kowal; Eric G Campbell; Aaron S Kesselheim
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Where Does it Begin and How to Stop It: Opportunities to Prevent "Bad" Physicians.

Authors:  Wendy Keegan; Wakaba Tessier; Julianne Story
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2021 May-Jun

9.  Prevalence of industry support and its relationship to research integrity.

Authors:  Patricia M Tereskerz; Ann B Hamric; Thomas M Guterbock; Jonathan D Moreno
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2009 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 10.  Cancer Screening in Older Adults: Individualized Decision-Making and Communication Strategies.

Authors:  Ashwin A Kotwal; Louise C Walter
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 5.456

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.