Literature DB >> 18055907

Teaching medical students about fair distribution of healthcare resources.

C Leget1, R Hoedemaekers.   

Abstract

Healthcare package decisions are complex. Different judgements about effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and disease burden influence the decision-making process. Moreover, different concepts of justice generate different ideas about fair distribution of healthcare resources. This paper presents a decision model that is used in medical school in order to familiarise medical students with the different concepts of justice and the ethical dimension of making concrete choices. The model is based on the four-stage decision model developed in the Netherlands by the Dunning Committee and the discussion that followed its presentation in 1991. Having to deal with 10 medical services, students working with the model learn to discern and integrate four different ideas of distributive justice that are integrated in a flow chart: libertarian, communitarian, egalitarian and utilitarian.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18055907      PMCID: PMC2598213          DOI: 10.1136/jme.2006.017095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  6 in total

1.  Justice and solidarity in priority setting in health care.

Authors:  Rogeer Hoedemaekers; Wim Dekkers
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2003-12

2.  Key concepts in health care priority setting.

Authors:  Rogeer Hoedemaekers; Wim Dekkers
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2003-12

3.  [Rivastigmine for Alzheimer disease; evaluation of preliminary results and of structured assessment of efficacy].

Authors:  E Richard; G J Walstra; J van Campen; E Vissers; W A van Gool
Journal:  Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd       Date:  2002-01-05

4.  Communitarian illusions: or why the Dutch proposal for setting priorities in health care must fail.

Authors:  T van Willigenburg
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1993-06

5.  Problematic notions in Dutch health care package decisions.

Authors:  Rogeer Hoedemaekers; Wija Oortwijn
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2003-12

6.  Choices in health care. A review of a report by the government Committee on Choices in Health Care. Ministry of Welfare, Health and Cultural Affairs, The Netherlands, 1992.

Authors:  W W Holland
Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Lond       Date:  1992-10
  6 in total
  7 in total

1.  Perception of Medical Students on the Need for End-of-Life Care: A Q-Methodology Study.

Authors:  Jorge Barros-Garcia-Imhof; Andrés Jiménez-Alfonso; Inés Gómez-Acebo; María Fernández-Ortiz; Jéssica Alonso-Molero; Javier Llorca; Alejandro Gonzalez-Castro; Trinidad Dierssen-Sotos
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 2.  A systematic review of moral reasons on orphan drug reimbursement.

Authors:  Bettina M Zimmermann; Johanna Eichinger; Matthias R Baumgartner
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.123

3.  Health economics, equity, and efficiency: are we almost there?

Authors:  Marcos Bosi Ferraz
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2015-02-12

4.  Translational ethics: an analytical framework of translational movements between theory and practice and a sketch of a comprehensive approach.

Authors:  Kristine Bærøe
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  Should basic health economics principles be taught during medical school in the UK?

Authors:  Muhammad A Ashraf; Yusuf Sherwani; Muhammad Najim; Maroof Ahmed; Riham Rabee; Osama Al-Jibury; Faisal Al-Mayahi; Aaniya Ahmed
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2015-10-12

6.  A call to reform medical curricula to sustain the NHS.

Authors:  Priyancaa Jeyabaladevan; Shivaani Yogalingam
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2018-12

7.  Can the EVIDEM Framework Tackle Issues Raised by Evaluating Treatments for Rare Diseases: Analysis of Issues and Policies, and Context-Specific Adaptation.

Authors:  Monika Wagner; Hanane Khoury; Jacob Willet; Donna Rindress; Mireille Goetghebeur
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.981

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.