Literature DB >> 14769013

Key concepts in health care priority setting.

Rogeer Hoedemaekers1, Wim Dekkers.   

Abstract

In decisions about inclusion (or exclusion) of health care services in the benefit package, different interpretations of notions like health, health risk, disease, quality of life or necessary care often remain implicit. Yet they can lead to different benefit package decisions. After a brief discussion of these concepts in definitions of the goals of medicine, the various value-judgements implicit in interpretations of key notions in health care are analysed and conclusions are drawn with regard to the composition of decision making bodies at various levels. It is further argued that such a body needs to discuss the various interpretations of key-notions explicitly in the various phases of a priority-setting procedure so that more consistent choices can be made in health care priority setting.

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14769013     DOI: 10.1023/B:HCAN.0000010060.43046.05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Anal        ISSN: 1065-3058


  8 in total

1.  The meaning of normal.

Authors:  P V Davis; J G Bradley
Journal:  Perspect Biol Med       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.416

2.  The goals of medicine. Setting new priorities.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.683

3.  The normal, and the perils of the sylleptic argument.

Authors:  E A Murphy
Journal:  Perspect Biol Med       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 1.416

4.  Perception of risk.

Authors:  P Slovic
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-04-17       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Health and adaptedness.

Authors:  I Pörn
Journal:  Theor Med       Date:  1993-12

Review 6.  Risk as moral danger: the social and political functions of risk discourse in public health.

Authors:  D Lupton
Journal:  Int J Health Serv       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.663

7.  Communitarian illusions: or why the Dutch proposal for setting priorities in health care must fail.

Authors:  T van Willigenburg
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1993-06

8.  The concept of abnormality in medical genetics.

Authors:  R Hoedemaekers; H ten Have
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  1999-12
  8 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  Clarifying efficiency-equity tradeoffs through explicit criteria, with a focus on developing countries.

Authors:  Chris James; Guy Carrin; William Savedoff; Piya Hanvoravongchai
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2005-03

2.  Teaching medical students about fair distribution of healthcare resources.

Authors:  C Leget; R Hoedemaekers
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  The power of "principles" in a national pharmaceuticals strategy.

Authors:  Catherine S Macpherson; Nuala P Kenny
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2009-02

4.  An ethical analysis of international health priority-setting.

Authors:  Nuala Kenny; Christine Joffres
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2007-08-15

5.  Analysing coverage decision-making: opening Pandora's box?

Authors:  Katharina Elisabeth Fischer; Reiner Leidl
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-02-06

6.  Action Guide for Addressing Ethical Challenges of Resource Allocation Within Community-Based Healthcare Organizations.

Authors:  Krista L Harrison; Holly A Taylor; Maria W Merritt
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  2018

Review 7.  A fair range of choice: justifying maximum patient choice in the British National Health Service.

Authors:  Stephen Wilmot
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2007-06

8.  Resource allocation within the National AIDS Control Program of Pakistan: a qualitative assessment of decision maker's opinions.

Authors:  Sara Husain; Masood Kadir; Zafar Fatmi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 2.655

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.