Literature DB >> 18055752

ACOG Committee Opinion No. 390, December 2007. Ethical decision making in obstetrics and gynecology.

.   

Abstract

Physicians vary widely in their familiarity with ethical theories and methods and their sensitivity toward ethical issues. It is important for physicians to improve their skills in addressing ethical questions. Obstetrician-gynecologists who are familiar with the concepts of medical ethics will be better able to approach complex ethical situations in a clear and structured way. By considering the ethical frameworks involving principles, virtues, care and feminist perspectives, concern for community, and case precedents, they can enhance their ability to make ethically justifiable clinical decisions. Guidelines,consisting of several logical steps, are offered to aid the practitioner in analyzing and resolving ethical problems.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18055752     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000291573.09193.36

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  4 in total

1.  Pregnancy in a Persistent Vegetative State: A Management Dilemma. Case Report, Literature Review and Ethical Concerns.

Authors:  Sujata Siwatch; Minakshi Rohilla; Apinderpreet Singh; Chirag Ahuja; Kajal Jain; Vanita Jain
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2019-09-20

2.  Pelvic floor symptoms 5 to 14 years after total versus subtotal hysterectomy for benign conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gabriel Francisco Aleixo; Marcelo C M Fonseca; Maria Augusta Tezelli Bortolini; Luiz Gustavo O Brito; Rodrigo A Castro
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Association of Etonogestrel-Releasing Contraceptive Implant with Reduced Weight Gain in an Exclusively Breastfed Infant: Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Alison M Stuebe; Amy G Bryant; Robyn Lewis; Anitha Muddana
Journal:  Breastfeed Med       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Obstetrical providers' preferred mode of delivery and attitude towards non-medically indicated caesarean sections: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  J C Rivo; M Amyx; V Pingray; R A Casale; A E Fiorillo; H B Krupitzki; J D Malamud; M Mendilaharzu; M L Medina; A B Del Pino; L Ribola; J A Schvartzman; G M Tartalo; M Trasmonte; S Varela; F Althabe; J M Belizán
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 6.531

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.