BACKGROUND & AIMS: Diet-induced obesity results from increased ingestion of energy-dense food and sedentary lifestyle in genetically susceptible individuals. An environmental factor that may have shaped our energy homeostasis throughout evolution is parasitic nematode infection. METHODS: To test the hypothesis that a metabolically "thrifty phenotype" is advantageous during intestinal nematode infection, we compared the responses to Heligmosomoides polygyrus infection between 2 mouse strains: obesity-prone C57Bl/6J vs obesity-resistant SWR/J. Metabolic phenotyping was performed using indirect calorimetry, dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, and magnetic resonance imaging scanning. Gene expression was assessed by quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Body weight was maintained in both strains during nematode infection via different mechanisms. There was no apparent change in energy expenditure between the strains; however, SWR/J mice exhibited a marked hyperphagia (calorie intake 60% higher than C57Bl/6J) to maintain body weight. The importance of hyperphagia was confirmed by severe weight loss in a group of infected SWR/J mice whose food intake was restricted to that of naïve mice. Furthermore, SWR/J mice expelled nematodes more rapidly than C57Bl/6J mice, an effect related to a T helper cell 2 immune response. CONCLUSIONS: C57Bl/6J mice are more energy efficient during parasitic nematode infection, which may explain their ability to tolerate the infection. SWR/J mice, on the other hand, require an increase in food intake to maintain energy stores during nematode infection. In addition, a strong T helper cell 2-mediated immune response that facilitates a prompt clearance of nematode infection in SWR/J mice may have evolved to conserve energy in this strain.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Diet-induced obesity results from increased ingestion of energy-dense food and sedentary lifestyle in genetically susceptible individuals. An environmental factor that may have shaped our energy homeostasis throughout evolution is parasitic nematode infection. METHODS: To test the hypothesis that a metabolically "thrifty phenotype" is advantageous during intestinal nematode infection, we compared the responses to Heligmosomoides polygyrus infection between 2 mouse strains: obesity-prone C57Bl/6J vs obesity-resistant SWR/J. Metabolic phenotyping was performed using indirect calorimetry, dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, and magnetic resonance imaging scanning. Gene expression was assessed by quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Body weight was maintained in both strains during nematode infection via different mechanisms. There was no apparent change in energy expenditure between the strains; however, SWR/J mice exhibited a marked hyperphagia (calorie intake 60% higher than C57Bl/6J) to maintain body weight. The importance of hyperphagia was confirmed by severe weight loss in a group of infected SWR/J mice whose food intake was restricted to that of naïve mice. Furthermore, SWR/J mice expelled nematodes more rapidly than C57Bl/6J mice, an effect related to a T helper cell 2 immune response. CONCLUSIONS: C57Bl/6J mice are more energy efficient during parasitic nematode infection, which may explain their ability to tolerate the infection. SWR/J mice, on the other hand, require an increase in food intake to maintain energy stores during nematode infection. In addition, a strong T helper cell 2-mediated immune response that facilitates a prompt clearance of nematode infection in SWR/J mice may have evolved to conserve energy in this strain.
Authors: Veronica Prpic; Patricia M Watson; Isabell C Frampton; Mark A Sabol; G Eric Jezek; Thomas W Gettys Journal: J Nutr Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Kristen L Williams; C Randall Fuller; James Fagin; P Kay Lund Journal: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 4.052
Authors: Anne Bugge; Dan Feng; Logan J Everett; Erika R Briggs; Shannon E Mullican; Fenfen Wang; Jennifer Jager; Mitchell A Lazar Journal: Genes Dev Date: 2012-04-01 Impact factor: 11.361
Authors: Emidio E Pistilli; Sasha Bogdanovich; Fleur Garton; Nan Yang; Jason P Gulbin; Jennifer D Conner; Barbara G Anderson; LeBris S Quinn; Kathryn North; Rexford S Ahima; Tejvir S Khurana Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2011-07-18 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Emidio E Pistilli; Sasha Bogdanovich; Marcus D Goncalves; Rexford S Ahima; Jennifer Lachey; Jasbir Seehra; Tejvir Khurana Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Tomasz Ahrends; Begüm Aydin; Fanny Matheis; Cajsa H Classon; François Marchildon; Gláucia C Furtado; Sérgio A Lira; Daniel Mucida Journal: Cell Date: 2021-10-29 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Gloria M Reeves; Sara Mazaheri; Soren Snitker; Patricia Langenberg; Ina Giegling; Annette M Hartmann; Bettina Konte; Marion Friedl; Olaoluwa Okusaga; Maureen W Groer; Harald Mangge; Daniel Weghuber; David B Allison; Dan Rujescu; Teodor T Postolache Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2013-12-25
Authors: Luigi Notari; Diana C Riera; Rex Sun; Jennifer A Bohl; Leon P McLean; Kathleen B Madden; Nico van Rooijen; Tim Vanuytsel; Joseph F Urban; Aiping Zhao; Terez Shea-Donohue Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-01-23 Impact factor: 3.240