Literature DB >> 18053431

Implementing the Fatigue Guidelines at one NCCN member institution: process and outcomes.

Tami Borneman1, Barbara F Piper, Virginia Chih-Yi Sun, Marianna Koczywas, Gwen Uman, Betty Ferrell.   

Abstract

Fatigue, despite being the most common and distressing symptom in cancer, is often unrelieved because of numerous patient, provider, and system barriers. The overall purpose of this 5-year prospective clinical trial is to translate the NCCN Cancer-Related Fatigue Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology and NCCN Adult Cancer Pain Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology into practice and develop a translational interventional model that can be replicated across settings. This article focuses on one NCCN member institution's experience related to the first phase of the NCCN Cancer-Related Fatigue Guidelines implementation, describing usual care compared with evidence-based guidelines. Phase 1 of this 3-phased clinical trial compared the usual care of fatigue with that administered according to the NCCN guidelines. Eligibility criteria included age 18 years or older; English-speaking; diagnosed with breast, lung, colon, or prostate cancer; and fatigue and/or pain ratings of 4 or more on a 0 to 10 screening scale. Research nurses screened all available subjects in a cancer center medical oncology clinic to identify those meeting these criteria. Instruments included the Piper Fatigue Scale, a Fatigue Barriers Scale, a Fatigue Knowledge Scale, and a Fatigue Chart Audit Tool. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used in data analysis. At baseline, 45 patients had fatigue only (> or = 4) and 24 had both fatigue and pain (> or = 4). This combined sample (N = 69) was predominantly Caucasian (65%), female (63%), an average of 60 years old, diagnosed with stage 3 or 4 breast cancer, and undergoing treatment (82%). The most common barriers noted were patients' belief that physicians would introduce the subject of fatigue if it was important (patient barrier); lack of fatigue documentation (professional barrier); and lack of supportive care referrals (system barrier). Findings showed several patient, professional, and system barriers that distinguish usual care from that recommended by the NCCN Cancer-Related Fatigue Guidelines. Phase 2, the intervention model, is designed to decrease these barriers and improve patient outcomes over time, and is in progress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18053431      PMCID: PMC2515169          DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2007.0090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw        ISSN: 1540-1405            Impact factor:   11.908


  22 in total

1.  How doctors learn: physicians' self-directed learning episodes.

Authors:  H B Slotnick
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Knowledge: insufficient for change.

Authors:  F D Ferris; C F von Gunten; L L Emanuel
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 3.  Fatigue in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Lilian M Nail
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 4.  Long-term persistence of symptoms.

Authors:  L M Nail
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.315

Review 5.  Educational interventions to improve cancer pain control: a systematic review.

Authors:  P Allard; E Maunsell; J Labbé; M Dorval
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 6.  The relationship between fatigue and sleep in cancer patients: a review.

Authors:  S Ancoli-Israel; P J Moore; V Jones
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.520

7.  Impact of formal continuing medical education: do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes?

Authors:  D Davis; M A O'Brien; N Freemantle; F M Wolf; P Mazmanian; A Taylor-Vaisey
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-09-01       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Impact of fatigue on quality of life in oncology patients.

Authors:  G A Curt
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.851

9.  Cancer-related fatigue: inevitable, unimportant and untreatable? Results of a multi-centre patient survey. Cancer Fatigue Forum.

Authors:  P Stone; A Richardson; E Ream; A G Smith; D J Kerr; N Kearney
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  Developing a community program on cancer pain and fatigue.

Authors:  M Grant; M Golant; L Rivera; G Dean; H Benjamin
Journal:  Cancer Pract       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug
View more
  23 in total

1.  Cancer-related fatigue: a survey of health practitioner knowledge and practice.

Authors:  Elizabeth J M Pearson; Meg E Morris; Carol E McKinstry
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Acupuncture for cancer-related fatigue in lung cancer patients: a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial.

Authors:  Chien-Shan Cheng; Lian-Yu Chen; Zhou-Yu Ning; Chen-Yue Zhang; Hao Chen; Zhen Chen; Xiao-Yan Zhu; Jing Xie
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Creating computable algorithms for symptom management in an outpatient thoracic oncology setting.

Authors:  Mary E Cooley; David F Lobach; Ellis Johns; Barbara Halpenny; Toni-Ann Saunders; Guilherme Del Fiol; Michael S Rabin; Pamela Calarese; Isidore L Berenbaum; Ken Zaner; Kathleen Finn; Donna L Berry; Janet L Abrahm
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 4.  Educational interventions for the management of cancer-related fatigue in adults.

Authors:  Sally Bennett; Amanda Pigott; Elaine M Beller; Terry Haines; Pamela Meredith; Christie Delaney
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-24

5.  Feasibility and acceptability of a Tai Chi Chih randomized controlled trial in senior female cancer survivors.

Authors:  Rebecca A Campo; Kathleen O'Connor; Kathleen C Light; Yoshio Nakamura; David L Lipschitz; Paul C LaStayo; Lisa Pappas; Kenneth Boucher; Michael R Irwin; Neeraj Agarwal; Anita Y Kinney
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.279

6.  Do clinicians and patients agree regarding symptoms? A comparison after definitive radiochemotherapy in 223 uterine cervical cancer patients.

Authors:  K Kirchheiner; R Nout; J Lindegaard; P Petrič; E V Limbergen; I-M Jürgenliemk-Schulz; C Haie-Meder; R Pötter; W Dörr
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Fatigue and functional impairment in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer survivors.

Authors:  Robert Hung; Paul Krebs; Elliot J Coups; Marc B Feinstein; Bernard J Park; Jack Burkhalter; Jamie S Ostroff
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 3.612

8.  Cancer-Related Fatigue, Version 2.2015.

Authors:  Ann M Berger; Kathi Mooney; Amy Alvarez-Perez; William S Breitbart; Kristen M Carpenter; David Cella; Charles Cleeland; Efrat Dotan; Mario A Eisenberger; Carmen P Escalante; Paul B Jacobsen; Catherine Jankowski; Thomas LeBlanc; Jennifer A Ligibel; Elizabeth Trice Loggers; Belinda Mandrell; Barbara A Murphy; Oxana Palesh; William F Pirl; Steven C Plaxe; Michelle B Riba; Hope S Rugo; Carolina Salvador; Lynne I Wagner; Nina D Wagner-Johnston; Finly J Zachariah; Mary Anne Bergman; Courtney Smith
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 9.  Cancer-related fatigue: role of oncology nurses in translating National Comprehensive Cancer Network assessment guidelines into practice.

Authors:  Barbara F Piper; Tami Borneman; Virginia Chih-Yi Sun; Marianna Koczywas; Gwen Uman; Betty Ferrell; Raysenia L James
Journal:  Clin J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.027

10.  Translating guidelines to practice: a training session about cancer-related fatigue.

Authors:  G Jones; N Rutkowski; G Trudel; C St-Gelais; M Ladouceur; J Brunet; S Lebel
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.