OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to examine the feasibility and acceptability of a Tai Chi Chih (TCC) intervention in senior female cancer survivors with physical functioning limitations, and its effects on health-related quality of life (QOL). DESIGN: This was a two-armed, parallel group, RCT with 12-weeks of Tai Chi Chih or Health Education Control. METHODS:Sixty-three senior (M age = 67 years, SD = 7.15) female cancer survivors (83% breast cancer, stages I-III) with physical functioning limitations (SF-12 Health Survey role-physical & physical functioning subscales) were randomized to 12-weeks of TCC or Health Education control (HEC). Primary outcomes were feasibility and acceptability. Secondary outcomes included health-related QOL (SF-36 Health Survey), and participants' qualitative feedback on the intervention. RESULTS: Retention (TCC = 91%; HEC = 81%) and class attendance (TCC = 79%; HEC = 83%) rates, and satisfaction levels for both study arms were high, but did not significantly differ from one another. At one-week post-intervention, none of the SF-36 scores differed between the TCC and HEC groups. Within-group analyses revealed significant improvements in the mental component summary score in TCC (p = 0.01), but not in HEC. Qualitative analyses indicated that the TCC group felt they received mental and physical benefits, whereas HEC group reported on social support benefits and information received. CONCLUSION: The TCC intervention was found to be a feasible and acceptable modality for senior female cancer survivors. Future, larger definitive trials are needed to clarify TCC dosage effects on QOL in this vulnerable population.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to examine the feasibility and acceptability of a Tai Chi Chih (TCC) intervention in senior female cancer survivors with physical functioning limitations, and its effects on health-related quality of life (QOL). DESIGN: This was a two-armed, parallel group, RCT with 12-weeks of Tai Chi Chih or Health Education Control. METHODS: Sixty-three senior (M age = 67 years, SD = 7.15) female cancer survivors (83% breast cancer, stages I-III) with physical functioning limitations (SF-12 Health Survey role-physical & physical functioning subscales) were randomized to 12-weeks of TCC or Health Education control (HEC). Primary outcomes were feasibility and acceptability. Secondary outcomes included health-related QOL (SF-36 Health Survey), and participants' qualitative feedback on the intervention. RESULTS: Retention (TCC = 91%; HEC = 81%) and class attendance (TCC = 79%; HEC = 83%) rates, and satisfaction levels for both study arms were high, but did not significantly differ from one another. At one-week post-intervention, none of the SF-36 scores differed between the TCC and HEC groups. Within-group analyses revealed significant improvements in the mental component summary score in TCC (p = 0.01), but not in HEC. Qualitative analyses indicated that the TCC group felt they received mental and physical benefits, whereas HEC group reported on social support benefits and information received. CONCLUSION: The TCC intervention was found to be a feasible and acceptable modality for senior female cancer survivors. Future, larger definitive trials are needed to clarify TCC dosage effects on QOL in this vulnerable population.
Entities:
Keywords:
Tai Chi Chih; feasibility randomized controlled trial; oncology; quality of life; senior female cancer survivors
Authors: Helen Lavretsky; Lily L Alstein; Richard E Olmstead; Linda M Ercoli; Marquertie Riparetti-Brown; Natalie St Cyr; Michael R Irwin Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Chenchen Wang; Christopher H Schmid; Ramel Rones; Robert Kalish; Janeth Yinh; Don L Goldenberg; Yoojin Lee; Timothy McAlindon Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-08-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lehana Thabane; Jinhui Ma; Rong Chu; Ji Cheng; Afisi Ismaila; Lorena P Rios; Reid Robson; Marroon Thabane; Lora Giangregorio; Charles H Goldsmith Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2010-01-06 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Keith M Bellizzi; Noreen M Aziz; Julia H Rowland; Kathryn Weaver; Neeraj K Arora; Ann S Hamilton; Ingrid Oakley-Girvan; Gretchen Keel Journal: J Cancer Epidemiol Date: 2012-07-25
Authors: Rebecca A Campo; Neeraj Agarwal; Paul C LaStayo; Kathleen O'Connor; Lisa Pappas; Kenneth M Boucher; Jerry Gardner; Sierra Smith; Kathleen C Light; Anita Y Kinney Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2013-10-30 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Xiaosha Ni; Raymond Javan Chan; Patsy Yates; Wenyi Hu; Xianhong Huang; Yan Lou Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-06-24 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Peter M Wayne; M S Lee; J Novakowski; K Osypiuk; J Ligibel; L E Carlson; R Song Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2017-12-08 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Heather Greenlee; Melissa J DuPont-Reyes; Lynda G Balneaves; Linda E Carlson; Misha R Cohen; Gary Deng; Jillian A Johnson; Matthew Mumber; Dugald Seely; Suzanna M Zick; Lindsay M Boyce; Debu Tripathy Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2017-04-24 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Rebecca A Campo; Kathleen C Light; Kathleen O'Connor; Yoshio Nakamura; David Lipschitz; Paul C LaStayo; Lisa M Pappas; Kenneth M Boucher; Michael R Irwin; Harry R Hill; Thomas B Martins; Neeraj Agarwal; Anita Y Kinney Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2014-08-28 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Maximilian Alexander Strunk; Eva M Zopf; Jule Steck; Stefanie Hamacher; Michael Hallek; Freerk T Baumann Journal: In Vivo Date: 2018 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.155