Literature DB >> 18053372

Patient satisfaction with outpatient lumbar microsurgical discectomy: a qualitative study.

Maria Hersht1, Eric M Massicotte, Mark Bernstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Lumbar microsurgical discectomy was traditionally done as an inpatient procedure, but over the last decade, there has been an ever-expanding shift toward outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy (OLM). We have been performing OLM since 1997 (MB) and 2002 (EMM), but no study of patient satisfaction has been carried out to date. the objective of our study was to investigate patient satisfaction with the experience.
METHODS: Between September 2004 and March 2005, we carried out a qualitative case study at Toronto Western Hospital, involving interviews with 28 patients who had recently undergone OLM. The protocol was approved by the institutional Research Ethics Board, and informed consent was obtained from each participant. Interviews were transcribed and stored anonymously and subjected to modified thematic analysis by 5 reviewers.
RESULTS: Analysis of the interviews yielded several overarching themes: 1) patients are surprised that back surgery can be done on an outpatient basis; 2) the amount and quality of information they receive is satisfactory; 3) the overall experience is positive; 4) trust in one's surgeon is important; and 5) some patients have significant back pain in the early postoperative period.
CONCLUSIONS: Most patients appreciate the need for the health care system to save money where possible so that it can be spent in other, more resource-intensive areas. Outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy satisfies this goal while retaining high patient satisfaction rates. Qualitative research can yield substantial insight, which will improve the experience for future patients. Qualitative research is rare in the surgical literature and can answer questions quantitative research methods cannot.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18053372      PMCID: PMC2386215     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  17 in total

Review 1.  Grounded theory: issues for research in nursing.

Authors:  L Sheldon
Journal:  Nurs Stand       Date:  1998 Sep 16-22

2.  Influence of depression on patients satisfaction with the outcome of microsurgical "key-hole" vs classical discectomy: prospective matched-cohort study.

Authors:  Ivana Ljubicić Bistrović; Dulijano Ljubicić; Darko Ekl; Ljubomir Penezić; Dejvis Mocenić; Marin F Stancić
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.351

3.  Microlumbar discectomy: a conservative surgical approach to the virgin herniated lumbar disc.

Authors:  R W Williams
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Outpatient laminotomy and discectomy.

Authors:  H S An; J M Simpson; R Stein
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1999-06

5.  Ambulatory surgery is safe and effective in radicular disc disease.

Authors:  J W Bookwalter; M D Busch; D Nicely
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Pain, nausea, vomiting and ocular complications delay discharge following ambulatory microdiscectomy.

Authors:  Shaheen Shaikh; Frances Chung; Charles Imarengiaye; Damian Yung; Mark Bernstein
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.063

7.  A qualitative study of attitudes toward error in patients facing brain tumour surgery.

Authors:  Mark Bernstein; Dawn Potvin; Douglas K Martin
Journal:  Can J Neurol Sci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.104

8.  Correlation between health outcome and length of hospital stay in lumbar microdiscectomy.

Authors:  T R Lorish; C T Tanabe; F T Waller; M R London; D J Lansky
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Development of a same day laminectomy program.

Authors:  Jeanne Scanlon; Becky Richards
Journal:  J Perianesth Nurs       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.084

10.  Speculum lumbar extraforaminal microdiscectomy.

Authors:  T G Obenchain
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  11 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes of patients with lumbar disc herniation, selected for one-level open-discectomy and microdiscectomy.

Authors:  Kotryna Veresciagina; Bronius Spakauskas; Kazys Vytautas Ambrozaitis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Regional variations in acceptance, and utilization of minimally invasive spinal surgery techniques among spine surgeons: results of a global survey.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; José-Antonio Soriano-Sánchez; Xifeng Zhang; Jorge Felipe Ramírez León; Sergio Soriano Solis; José Gabriel Rugeles Ortíz; Carolina Ramírez Martínez; Gabriel Oswaldo Alonso Cuéllar; Kaixuan Liu; Qiang Fu; Marlon Sudário de Lima E Silva; Paulo Sérgio Teixeira de Carvalho; Stefan Hellinger; Álvaro Dowling; Nicholas Prada; Gun Choi; Girish Datar; Anthony Yeung
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-01

3.  Readmissions After Outpatient Transforaminal Decompression for Lumbar Foraminal and Lateral Recess Stenosis.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-15

4.  Results and limitations of outpatient and overnight stay laminectomies for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  David Yen; Abdu Albargi
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Patient Satisfaction is Equivalent for Inpatient and Outpatient Minimally-Invasive Adrenalectomy.

Authors:  Richard Augusto Pigg; Jessica M Fazendin; John R Porterfield; Herbert Chen; Brenessa Lindeman
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 2.192

6.  Patient and physiotherapist perceptions of rehabilitation following primary lumbar discectomy: a qualitative focus group study embedded within an external pilot and feasibility trial.

Authors:  Alison Rushton; Nicola R Heneghan; Alison Heap; Louise White; Melanie Calvert; Peter C Goodwin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Incidence, Management, and Cost of Complications After Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression Surgery for Lumbar Foraminal and Lateral Recess Stenosis: A Value Proposition for Outpatient Ambulatory Surgery.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-02-22

8.  Use of "Inside-Out" Technique for Direct Visualization of a Vacuum Vertically Unstable Intervertebral Disc During Routine Lumbar Endoscopic Transforaminal Decompression-A Correlative Study of Clinical Outcomes and the Prognostic Value of Lumbar Radiographs.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Jorge Felipe Ramírez León; Anthony Yeung
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-10-31

9.  Return to work and recovery time analysis after outpatient endoscopic lumbar transforaminal decompression surgery.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Nicholas A Ransom; Anthony Yeung
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-01

10.  Surgeon motivation, and obstacles to the implementation of minimally invasive spinal surgery techniques.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; José-Antonio Soriano-Sánchez; Xifeng Zhang; Jorge Felipe Ramírez León; Sergio Soriano Solis; José Gabriel Rugeles Ortíz; Carolina Ramírez Martínez; Gabriel Oswaldo Alonso Cuéllar; Kaixuan Liu; Qiang Fu; Marlon Sudário de Lima E Silva; Paulo Sérgio Teixeira de Carvalho; Stefan Hellinger; Álvaro Dowling; Nicholas Prada; Gun Choi; Girish Datar; Anthony Yeung
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.