| Literature DB >> 18053159 |
Margareta Scharin Täng1, Truls Råmunddal, Malin Lindbom, Elmir Omerovic.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Cardiac reserve can be used to predict survival and outcome in patients with heart failure. The aim of this study was to investigate if native cardiac reserve could predict survival after myocardial infarction (MI) in mice.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2007 PMID: 18053159 PMCID: PMC2217517 DOI: 10.1186/1476-7120-5-46
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Ultrasound ISSN: 1476-7120 Impact factor: 2.062
Figure 1A-C. Experimental setup. A. The echocardiographic system. B. Anesthetic setup. C. The high-frequency 15-MHz linear transducer.
Figure 2Study design. Stress-echocardiography was performed on 10–12-week-old mice. One day after the investigation, myocardial infarction (MI) was induced by ligation of LAD. The animals were then followed for 2 weeks.
Left ventricle posterior wall dimension (LVPWd), left ventricle end-diastolic diameter (LVEDd), left ventricle end-systolic diameter (LVESd), fraction shortening (FS), cardiac output (CO), R-R interval (R-R), survivors (S) and deceased (D). Data shown as mean ± SD
| Variables at rest | All (n = 27) | Survivors (n = 7) | Deceased (n = 20) | p-value S vs D |
| LPWd (mm) | 0.56 ± 0.07 | 0.57 ± 0.09 | 0.56 ± 0.06 | 0.61 |
| LVEDd (mm) | 4.22 ± 0.32 | 4.25 ± 0.43 | 4.21 ± 0.28 | 0.74 |
| LVESDd (mm) | 2.73 ± 0.56 | 2.97 ± 0.59 | 2.65 ± 0.54 | 0.19 |
| FS (%) | 35.7 ± 9.9 | 30.7 ± 8.7 | 37.4 ± 9.9 | 0.13 |
| CO (ml/min) | 14.9 ± 3.3 | 12.9 ± 3.6 | 15.6 ± 3.0 | 0.07 |
| R-R (ms) | 150 ± 44 | 183 ± 70 | 138 ± 24 | 0.02 |
Figure 3Native cardiac reserve in WT mice before induction of myocardial infarction. A. Example of a surviving mouse. FS rest and stress. B. Example of a deceased mouse. FS rest and stress.
Left ventricle end-diastolic diameter (LVEDd), left ventricle end-systolic diameter (LVESd), fraction shortening (FS), cardiac output (CO), R-R interval (R-R), survivors (S) and deceased (D). Data shown as mean ± SD
| Variables | All (n = 27) | Survivors (n = 7) | Deceased (n = 20) | p-value S vs D |
| ΔLVEDd (mm) | -0.62 ± 0.32 | -0.77 ± 0.38 | -0.57 ± 0.29 | 0.15 |
| ΔLVESd (mm) | -1.43 ± 0.64 | -1.86 ± 0.76 | -1.28 ± 0.53 | 0.04 |
| ΔFS (%) | 28.2 ± 12.5 | 37.4 ± 14.4 | 25.0 ± 10.3 | 0.02 |
| ΔCO (ml/min) | -0.01 ± 0.38 | 0.27 ± 0.48 | -0.10 ± 0.29 | 0.02 |
| ΔR-R (ms) | -32 ± 43 | -68 ± 68 | -19 ± 21 | < 0.01 |
Figure 4Native cardiac and chronotropic reserve in WT mice divided according to surviving capacity. A. Cardiac reserve expressed as delta FS %. ANOVA p < 0.05. B. Chronotropic reserve expressed as delta R-R interval in ms. ANOVA p < 0.05. Data shown as mean ± SEM.