| Literature DB >> 18053145 |
Peter Ruzanov1, Steven J Jones, Donald L Riddle.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Alternative RNA splicing allows cells to produce multiple protein isoforms from one gene. These isoforms may have specialized functions, and may be tissue- or stage-specific. Our aim was to use computational analysis of SAGE and genomic data to predict alternatively spliced transcripts expressed in C. elegans.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2007 PMID: 18053145 PMCID: PMC2216036 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-447
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Figure 1Schematic illustration of computational prediction and experimental validation of splice variants. We used virtual splicing events to extract all potential SAGE tags spanning the predicted splice junctions as shown. Introns and flanking 13 bp sequences were used for extraction of SAGE tags identifying cases of intron retention. For exon skipping validation, one of the primers spanned the predicted splice junction, so that hybridization with the template mRNA was possible only if the predicted transcript was present in the mRNA pool. Detection of an RT-PCR product with a larger size than expected for a normally spliced isoform confirmed intron retention events.
Expression data for exon skipping candidates
| TGAAAGAAAA | 5..7 | 255 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| ATAAAAATAG | 6..8 | 723 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| AGAATGAAAA | 4..6 | 102 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| TATTCATTCT | 4..6 | 219 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| GGTTTATAAA | 3..5 | 66 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| CCAGAAATGG | 4..6 | 264 | 3 | 13 | 6 | 1 | 12 | 22 |
| GAACTGAATG | 10..12 | 123 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| CTAAAATGAT | 1..3 | 399 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
SAGE data for eight tags selected for validation of predicted exon skipping by RT-PCR. Junction column shows the exons that form the predicted splice junction, and the other columns show the normalized tag counts in the SAGE libraries made from the RNA preparations used in validation experiments: F-1, 6: fer-15 at days 1 and 6 of adulthood; DF-1, 6, 10: daf-2; fer-15 at days 1, 6 and 10 of adulthood; N2-1: N2 at day 1 of adulthood. Tags in all libraries were normalized to 100,000 total tags.
Expression data for intron retention candidates
| TACGATTTCA | 2 | 48 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| AGGATACAAT | 1 | 81 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| CGGTTATTGC | 3 | 69 | 27 | 7 | 31 | 1 | 73 | 10 | 3 |
| TGAAATAATA | 12 | 51 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| ATCGGTGTGT | 2 | 91 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| TAATGAATTT | 2 | 56 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| TCAATAAATA | 8 | 82 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| TTTTATATAA | 4 | 47 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 |
| AAAACAATAA | 5 | 70 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| TATTGGAATC | 3 | 97 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
SAGE data for ten tags selected for validation of intron retention by RT-PCR. The Intron column indicates which intron was predicted to be retained and the Intron Length column shows the length of that intron in nucleotides. The other columns show the normalized tag counts in the SAGE libraries made from the RNA preparations used in validation experiments: F-1, 6: fer-15 at days 1 and 6 of adulthood; DF-1, 6, 10: daf-2; fer-15 at days 1, 6 and 10 of adulthood; N2-1: N2 at day 1 of adulthood; DAU: young dauer larvae. Tags in all libraries were normalized to 100,000 total tags.
Figure 2Validation RT-PCR experiments. Left panel: the results of RT-PCR experiments for eight selected exon skipping candidates are shown. Lanes 1–8 correspond to the genes C33G3.4, C52E4.6a, F27D4.4, T01G5.1, T05B4.1, T14G10.1, W04G5.9 and Y49F6B.8. PCR products of the expected sizes (400 – 600 bp) were observed for four genes. *DNA sequencing did not confirm one of the candidates (C33G3.4, lane 1 on the left panel). Right panel: the results of the intron retention analysis. The positions of the PCR product for normally spliced isoforms (empty arrows) and isoforms with intron retention (black arrows) are shown. Lanes 1–10 correspond to the genes B0041.3, C08B6.13, C14C6.5, C24G6.3, D1054.10, F07C6.2, R09E10.3, T23G7.5, W01A8.3 and Y116A8C.30. * Additional RT-PCR experiments with oligo(dT) primer followed by DNA sequencing disproved three candidates (C08B6.13, R09E10.3 and W01A8.3).