Literature DB >> 1804962

Evidence for a contribution of the motor cortex to the long-latency stretch reflex of the human thumb.

C Capaday1, R Forget, R Fraser, Y Lamarre.   

Abstract

1. In normal subjects, transcranial magnetic stimulation of the hand region of the motor cortex evokes motor responses only in contralateral hand muscles at a latency of about 19-24 ms. In contrast, stimulation of the motor cortex of three mirror movement subjects evoked, nearly simultaneously, motor responses in hand muscles on both sides of the body at latencies similar to those of normal subjects. In these subjects no other neuroanatomical pathways appear to be abnormally directed across the mid-line. Thus, their mirror movements are probably due to a projection of the corticospinal tract to homologous motoneurone pools on each side of the body. 2. We reasoned that if the motor cortex contributes to the generation of long-latency stretch reflex responses then in these mirror movement subjects stretching a muscle on one side of the body should produce long-latency reflex responses in the ipsilateral and the homologous contralateral muscle. 3. To test this idea experiments were done on normal human subjects and on the subjects with mirror movements. The electromyographic (EMG) activity of the flexor pollicis longus muscle (FPL) on each side of the body was recorded. Stretch of the distal phalanx of the thumb of one hand produced a series of distinct reflex EMG responses in the ipsilateral FPL. The earliest response, when present, began at 25 ms (S.D. = 3.5 ms) and was followed by responses at 40 (S.D. = 3.9 ms) and 56 ms (S.D. = 4.3 ms). There was no difference, either in timing or intensity, between the ipsilateral FPL EMG responses of normal subjects and those of the mirror movement subjects. 4. No response of any kind was observed in the contralateral (unstretched) FPL of normal subjects. In contrast, we observed in all three mirror movement subjects EMG responses in the contralateral (unstretched) FPL beginning at 45-50 ms. The latency of this response is considerably shorter than the fastest voluntary kinaesthetic reaction time, which was on average 130 ms (S.D. = 11 ms). The contralateral long-latency EMG response observed in the mirror movement subjects was on average 30% (range 5-60%) of that on the ipsilateral side. No short-latency response (25 ms) was ever observed in the contralateral FPL of these subjects. 5. These observations are quite consistent with the idea that the long-latency stretch reflex responses of hand and finger muscles are produced, at least in part, by the motor cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1804962      PMCID: PMC1180150          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  17 in total

1.  On the localization of the stretch reflex of intrinsic hand muscles in a patient with mirror movements.

Authors:  P B Matthews; S F Farmer; D A Ingram
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Mirror movements studied in a patient with Klippel-Feil syndrome.

Authors:  S F Farmer; D A Ingram; J A Stephens
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Long-latency stretch reflexes of two intrinsic muscles of the human hand analysed by cooling the arm.

Authors:  P B Matthews
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Statistical limits for detecting change in the cumulative sum derivative of the peristimulus time histogram.

Authors:  N J Davey; P H Ellaway; R B Stein
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Electromyographic studies of congenital mirror movements.

Authors:  R Forget; D Boghen; E Attig; Y Lamarre
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  The Ferrier lecture, 1968. Motor apparatus of the baboon's hand.

Authors:  C G Phillips
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1969-05-20

7.  Motor responses to sudden limb displacements in primates with specific CNS lesions and in human patients with motor system disorders.

Authors:  R G Lee; W G Tatton
Journal:  Can J Neurol Sci       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 2.104

8.  Long-latency spinal reflexes in humans.

Authors:  K Darton; O C Lippold; M Shahani; U Shahani
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Servo action in the human thumb.

Authors:  C D Marsden; P A Merton; H B Morton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Comparison of human transcallosal responses evoked by magnetic coil and electrical stimulation.

Authors:  R Q Cracco; V E Amassian; P J Maccabee; J B Cracco
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec
View more
  39 in total

1.  Reactive control of precision grip does not depend on fast transcortical reflex pathways in X-linked Kallmann subjects.

Authors:  L M Harrison; M J Mayston; R S Johansson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  Congenital mirror movements: a clue to understanding bimanual motor control.

Authors:  Cécile Galléa; Traian Popa; Ségolène Billot; Aurélie Méneret; Christel Depienne; Emmanuel Roze
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Proposed cortical and sub-cortical contributions to the long-latency stretch reflex in the forearm.

Authors:  Gwyn N Lewis; Melody A Polych; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Medium-latency reflex response elicited from the flexor carpi radialis by radial nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Hilmi Uysal; Ferah Kızılay; Sirin Erkaya Inel; Hakan Özen; Gökhan Pek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Optimal feedback control and the long-latency stretch response.

Authors:  J Andrew Pruszynski; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The effect of task instruction on the excitability of spinal and supraspinal reflex pathways projecting to the biceps muscle.

Authors:  Gwyn N Lewis; Colum D MacKinnon; Eric J Perreault
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The monosynaptic Ia afferent pathway can largely explain the stretch duration effect of the long latency M2 response.

Authors:  Jasper Schuurmans; Erwin de Vlugt; Alfred C Schouten; Carel G M Meskers; Jurriaan H de Groot; Frans C T van der Helm
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Interactions between limb and environmental mechanics influence stretch reflex sensitivity in the human arm.

Authors:  Matthew A Krutky; Vengateswaran J Ravichandran; Randy D Trumbower; Eric J Perreault
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Implicit learning and generalization of stretch response modulation in humans.

Authors:  Nicolas A Turpin; Mindy F Levin; Anatol G Feldman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Evidence that a transcortical pathway contributes to stretch reflexes in the tibialis anterior muscle in man.

Authors:  N Petersen; L O Christensen; H Morita; T Sinkjaer; J Nielsen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.