BACKGROUND: Because of poor patient compliance and clinical inertia, hypertension control rates remain poor. Home blood-pressure measurements (HBPM) improve compliance of patients and achievement of blood pressure (BP) targets. However, few studies have evaluated self-BP management by patients. METHODS: In a multicenter, prospective, single-group, open-label pilot study of 111 patients whose hypertension was uncontrolled despite monotherapy, we studied satisfaction with, and feasibility of, HBPM and self-titration of antihypertensive treatment using telemedicine for compliance, efficacy, and safety. After education (protocol, action plan, and use of the HBPM device), patients performed a sequence of HBPM every 2 weeks for 8 weeks. Following a stepwise approach, treatment was increased by the patient at weeks 4 and 6 if average HBPM values exceeded predefined limits. For each titration, the patient informed the Core Center by telemedicine, but BP values were transferred automatically. RESULTS: Overall, 80% of patients were satisfied (58%) or very satisfied (23%) with the program (95% confidence interval, 73% to 87%). Regarding compliance, 78% of patients fully complied with self-measurement, and just over 71% titrated their treatment adequately. Physicians were satisfied (52%) or very satisfied (22%) with the program. Between the first and final visits (at week 8), office systolic/diastolic BP (mean +/- SD) decreased significantly from 151 +/- 9/91 +/- 6 to 143 +/- 13/84 +/- 11 mmHg. During the trial, HBPM (mean +/- SD) decreased significantly from 149 +/- 13/86 +/- 12 to 138 +/- 16/81 +/- 10 mmHg. No significant safety issues were reported. CONCLUSIONS: This innovative approach to the management of hypertension, combining self-measurement and self-titration, is feasible, well-accepted by both patients and physicians, and safe.
BACKGROUND: Because of poor patient compliance and clinical inertia, hypertension control rates remain poor. Home blood-pressure measurements (HBPM) improve compliance of patients and achievement of blood pressure (BP) targets. However, few studies have evaluated self-BP management by patients. METHODS: In a multicenter, prospective, single-group, open-label pilot study of 111 patients whose hypertension was uncontrolled despite monotherapy, we studied satisfaction with, and feasibility of, HBPM and self-titration of antihypertensive treatment using telemedicine for compliance, efficacy, and safety. After education (protocol, action plan, and use of the HBPM device), patients performed a sequence of HBPM every 2 weeks for 8 weeks. Following a stepwise approach, treatment was increased by the patient at weeks 4 and 6 if average HBPM values exceeded predefined limits. For each titration, the patient informed the Core Center by telemedicine, but BP values were transferred automatically. RESULTS: Overall, 80% of patients were satisfied (58%) or very satisfied (23%) with the program (95% confidence interval, 73% to 87%). Regarding compliance, 78% of patients fully complied with self-measurement, and just over 71% titrated their treatment adequately. Physicians were satisfied (52%) or very satisfied (22%) with the program. Between the first and final visits (at week 8), office systolic/diastolic BP (mean +/- SD) decreased significantly from 151 +/- 9/91 +/- 6 to 143 +/- 13/84 +/- 11 mmHg. During the trial, HBPM (mean +/- SD) decreased significantly from 149 +/- 13/86 +/- 12 to 138 +/- 16/81 +/- 10 mmHg. No significant safety issues were reported. CONCLUSIONS: This innovative approach to the management of hypertension, combining self-measurement and self-titration, is feasible, well-accepted by both patients and physicians, and safe.
Authors: E P Bray; M I Jones; M Banting; S Greenfield; F D R Hobbs; P Little; B Williams; R J Mcmanus Journal: J Hum Hypertens Date: 2015-01-08 Impact factor: 3.012
Authors: Nathalie Eikelenboom; Jan van Lieshout; Annelies Jacobs; Frank Verhulst; Joyca Lacroix; Aart van Halteren; Maarten Klomp; Ivo Smeele; Michel Wensing Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2016-04-14 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Lori Mosca; Emelia J Benjamin; Kathy Berra; Judy L Bezanson; Rowena J Dolor; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; L Kristin Newby; Ileana L Piña; Véronique L Roger; Leslee J Shaw; Dong Zhao; Theresa M Beckie; Cheryl Bushnell; Jeanine D'Armiento; Penny M Kris-Etherton; Jing Fang; Theodore G Ganiats; Antoinette S Gomes; Clarisa R Gracia; Constance K Haan; Elizabeth A Jackson; Debra R Judelson; Ellie Kelepouris; Carl J Lavie; Anne Moore; Nancy A Nussmeier; Elizabeth Ofili; Suzanne Oparil; Pamela Ouyang; Vivian W Pinn; Katherine Sherif; Sidney C Smith; George Sopko; Nisha Chandra-Strobos; Elaine M Urbina; Viola Vaccarino; Nanette K Wenger Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2011-03-22 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Miren I Jones; Sheila M Greenfield; Emma P Bray; Sabrina Baral-Grant; F D Richard Hobbs; Roger Holder; Paul Little; Jonathan Mant; Satnam K Virdee; Bryan Williams; Richard J McManus Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Lori Mosca; Emelia J Benjamin; Kathy Berra; Judy L Bezanson; Rowena J Dolor; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; L Kristin Newby; Ileana L Piña; Véronique L Roger; Leslee J Shaw; Dong Zhao; Theresa M Beckie; Cheryl Bushnell; Jeanine D'Armiento; Penny M Kris-Etherton; Jing Fang; Theodore G Ganiats; Antoinette S Gomes; Clarisa R Gracia; Constance K Haan; Elizabeth A Jackson; Debra R Judelson; Ellie Kelepouris; Carl J Lavie; Anne Moore; Nancy A Nussmeier; Elizabeth Ofili; Suzanne Oparil; Pamela Ouyang; Vivian W Pinn; Katherine Sherif; Sidney C Smith; George Sopko; Nisha Chandra-Strobos; Elaine M Urbina; Viola Vaccarino; Nanette K Wenger Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-02-14 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Richard W Grant; Jennifer C Pandiscio; Hannah Pajolek; Alyssa Woulfe; Alexandra Pelletier; Joseph Kvedar; Elyse R Park Journal: Inform Prim Care Date: 2012