Literature DB >> 18046784

A critical review of fear tests used on cattle, pigs, sheep, poultry and horses.

B Forkman1, A Boissy, M-C Meunier-Salaün, E Canali, R B Jones.   

Abstract

Fear is arguably the most commonly investigated emotion in domestic animals. In the current review we attempt to establish the level of repeatability and validity found for fear tests used on cattle, pigs, sheep and goats, poultry and horses. We focus the review on the three most common types of fear tests: the arena test (open field), the novel object test, and the restraint test. For some tests, e.g. tonic immobility in poultry, there is a good and broad literature on factors that affect the outcome of the test, the validity of the test and its age dependency. However, there are comparatively few of these well defined and validated tests and what is especially missing for most tests is information on the robustness, i.e., what aspects can be changed without affecting the validity of the tests. The relative absence of standardized tests hampers the development of applied ethology as a science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18046784     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.03.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  141 in total

Review 1.  An integrative and functional framework for the study of animal emotion and mood.

Authors:  Michael Mendl; Oliver H P Burman; Elizabeth S Paul
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Differences in gut microbiota composition of laying hen lines divergently selected on feather pecking.

Authors:  Jerine A J van der Eijk; Hugo de Vries; Joergen B Kjaer; Marc Naguib; Bas Kemp; Hauke Smidt; T Bas Rodenburg; Aart Lammers
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Trans-generational effects of prenatal stress in quail.

Authors:  Floriane Guibert; Sophie Lumineau; Kurt Kotrschal; Erich Möstl; Marie-Annick Richard-Yris; Cécilia Houdelier
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Use of cognitive bias as a welfare tool in poultry.

Authors:  Ľubor Košťál; Zuzana Skalná; Katarína Pichová
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Investigation of influence of growing pigs' positive affective state on behavioral and physiological parameters using structural equation modeling.

Authors:  Katja L Krugmann; Farina J Mieloch; Joachim Krieter; Irena Czycholl
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Transcriptome changes underlie alterations in behavioral traits in different types of chicken.

Authors:  Siyu Chen; Chao Yan; Hai Xiang; Jinlong Xiao; Jian Liu; Hui Zhang; Jikun Wang; Hao Liu; Xiben Zhang; Maojun Ou; Zelin Chen; Weibo Li; Simon P Turner; Xingbo Zhao
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Ethanol exposure during the early first trimester equivalent impairs reflexive motor activity and heightens fearfulness in an avian model.

Authors:  Susan M Smith; George R Flentke; Katherine A Kragtorp; Laura Tessmer
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 2.405

8.  Social instability in laying quail: consequences on yolk steroids and offspring's phenotype.

Authors:  Floriane Guibert; Marie-Annick Richard-Yris; Sophie Lumineau; Kurt Kotrschal; Daniel Guémené; Aline Bertin; Erich Möstl; Cécilia Houdelier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Genetical Genomics of Behavior: A Novel Chicken Genomic Model for Anxiety Behavior.

Authors:  Martin Johnsson; Michael J Williams; Per Jensen; Dominic Wright
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Do malaria parasites manipulate the escape behaviour of their avian hosts? An experimental study.

Authors:  Luz Garcia-Longoria; Anders P Møller; Javier Balbontín; Florentino de Lope; Alfonso Marzal
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.289

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.