Literature DB >> 18046645

Chemo-embolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with different sizes of embolization particles.

Nikhil B Amesur1, Albert B Zajko, Brian I Carr.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the size responses and vascular responses to three different sizes of Embosphere (EMBS) embolization particles used for chemo-embolization in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Forty-seven patients with biopsy proven HCC treated with TACE using EMBS (Biosphere Medical, Rockland, MA, USA) were included in this study. EMBS are non-resorbable tris-acryl gelatin defined-size microspheres. Sixteen patients were treated with 40-120 micron (40-microm), 13 patients with 100-300 (100-microm), and 18 patients with 300-500 (300-microm) EMBS particles. We measured the two-dimensional area and vascularity of the tumor index lesion on initial and subsequent CTs after treatment. Lesions were classified into four grades based on the degree of vascularity measured in 25% increments. Size of tumor after one treatment decreased by an average (avg) of 18% for 40-120-microm particles, 38% for 100-300-microm particles, and 17% for 300-500-microm particles. After three treatments, size decreased by an avg of 46% for 40-120-microm particles, 76% for 100-300-microm particles, and 46% for 300-500-microm particles. Vascularity decrease was also measured after the first and third treatments, and defined as a decrease of one or more grades in tumor vascularity. Results were as follows (% of patients with decrease). For 40-120-microm particles: 1 and 3 treatments, 53% and 88% of patients. For 100-300-microm particles: 1 and 3 treatments, 60% and 88% of patients. For 300-500-microm particles: 1 and 3 treatments, 50% and 57% of patients. It was concluded the 100-300-microm EMBS particles produce slightly higher responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18046645     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-007-9995-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  28 in total

Review 1.  Chemoembolization of hepatic neoplasms: safety, complications, and when to worry.

Authors:  J Gates; G G Hartnell; K E Stuart; M E Clouse
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization of liver tumors: effects of embolization protocol on injectable volume of chemotherapy and subsequent arterial patency.

Authors:  Jean-Francois H Geschwind; Douglas E Ramsey; Berry Cleffken; B C H van der Wal; Hicham Kobeiter; Krishna Juluru; George G Hartnell; Michael A Choti
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Long-term prognosis of patients undergoing transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of cisplatin lipiodol suspension and doxorubicin hydrochloride emulsion.

Authors:  K Kamada; T Nakanishi; M Kitamoto; H Aikata; Y Kawakami; K Ito; T Asahara; G Kajiyama
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 4.  Sequential transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  H J Jaeger; U M Mehring; F Castañeda; F Hasse; G Blumhardt; D Loehlein; K D Mathias
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 5.  Primary liver tumors.

Authors:  W Y Lau
Journal:  Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct

Review 6.  Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: anatomic and hemodynamic considerations in the hepatic artery and portal vein.

Authors:  Kwang-Hun Lee; Kyu-Bo Sung; Do-Yun Lee; Sang Joon Park; Ki Whang Kim; Jeong-Sik Yu
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Hepatic artery embolization in the treatment of hepatic neoplasms.

Authors:  V P Chuang; S Wallace
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Calogero Cammà; Filippo Schepis; Ambrogio Orlando; Maddalena Albanese; Lillian Shahied; Franco Trevisani; Pietro Andreone; Antonio Craxì; Mario Cottone
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  In vitro study of the compatibility of tris-acryl gelatin microspheres with various chemotherapeutic agents.

Authors:  Jean-Noël Vallée; Daouda Lo; Remy Guillevin; Philippe Reb; Carmen Adem; Jacques Chiras
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.464

10.  In vivo and in vitro analysis of the effectiveness of doxorubicin combined with temporary arterial occlusion in liver tumors.

Authors:  J B Kruskal; L Hlatky; P Hahnfeldt; K Teramoto; K R Stokes; M E Clouse
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.464

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Current status of embolic agents for liver tumor embolization.

Authors:  Keigo Osuga; Noboru Maeda; Hiroki Higashihara; Shinichi Hori; Tetsuro Nakazawa; Kaishu Tanaka; Masahisa Nakamura; Kentaro Kishimoto; Yusuke Ono; Noriyuki Tomiyama
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Therapeutic equivalence in survival for hepatic arterial chemoembolization and yttrium 90 microsphere treatments in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a two-cohort study.

Authors:  Brian I Carr; Venkateswarlu Kondragunta; Shama C Buch; Robert A Branch
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Interventional radiology and the care of the oncology patient.

Authors:  Siobhan B O'Neill; Owen J O'Connor; Max F Ryan; Michael M Maher
Journal:  Radiol Res Pract       Date:  2011-03-29

4.  Clinical Study on the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia by Embolization of Prostate Artery Based on Embosphere Microspheres and Gelatin Sponge Granules.

Authors:  Jinglei Liu; Dianwei Shi; Liang Li; Liming Cao; Jianyu Liu; Jingliang He; Zhihui Liang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 2.682

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.