PURPOSE: To evaluate long-term prognosis of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with use of cisplatin (CDDP) lipiodol (LPD) suspension (CDDP/LPD) compared with that with use of doxorubicin hydrochloride (ADM) LPD emulsion (ADM/LPD) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred eight patients were treated with use of CDDP/LPD and 26 were treated with use of ADM/LPD. Survival rates and frequency of side effects and complications in the CDDP/LPD group were compared with those in the ADM/LPD group. RESULTS: CDDP/LPD was given at a dose of 15-70 mg (mean dose, 41 mg), whereas ADM/LPD was given at a dose of 20-100 mg (mean dose, 57 mg) throughout the study period. The survival rates in the CDDP/LPD group were 81% at 1 year, 41% at 3 years, 19% at 5 years, and 13% at 7 years, whereas those in the ADM/LPD group were 67% at 1 year, 18% at 3 years, and 0% at 5 years. The CDDP/LPD group showed significantly better survival than the ADM/LPD group (P <.05). In the CDDP/LPD group, there was a significant prolongation of survival in patients with monofocal HCC (P <.05) and patients with HCC assessed as an almost complete LPD accumulation (P <.05). There were no significant differences in survival rates in the ADM/LPD group according to tumor size and number of tumors. Hepatic failure was observed in 8% of all procedures and was not different between the two therapeutic groups. Renal dysfunction was observed in 2% of all treatments involving CDDP/LPD, and it resolved spontaneously with appropriate medications. CONCLUSIONS: TACE with use of low-dose CDDP was efficacious for unresectable HCC and had few complications. TACE with use of CDDP may contribute to prolongation of the life span of patients with HCC versus TACE with use of ADM.
PURPOSE: To evaluate long-term prognosis of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with use of cisplatin (CDDP) lipiodol (LPD) suspension (CDDP/LPD) compared with that with use of doxorubicin hydrochloride (ADM) LPD emulsion (ADM/LPD) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred eight patients were treated with use of CDDP/LPD and 26 were treated with use of ADM/LPD. Survival rates and frequency of side effects and complications in the CDDP/LPD group were compared with those in the ADM/LPD group. RESULTS:CDDP/LPD was given at a dose of 15-70 mg (mean dose, 41 mg), whereas ADM/LPD was given at a dose of 20-100 mg (mean dose, 57 mg) throughout the study period. The survival rates in the CDDP/LPD group were 81% at 1 year, 41% at 3 years, 19% at 5 years, and 13% at 7 years, whereas those in the ADM/LPD group were 67% at 1 year, 18% at 3 years, and 0% at 5 years. The CDDP/LPD group showed significantly better survival than the ADM/LPD group (P <.05). In the CDDP/LPD group, there was a significant prolongation of survival in patients with monofocal HCC (P <.05) and patients with HCC assessed as an almost complete LPD accumulation (P <.05). There were no significant differences in survival rates in the ADM/LPD group according to tumor size and number of tumors. Hepatic failure was observed in 8% of all procedures and was not different between the two therapeutic groups. Renal dysfunction was observed in 2% of all treatments involving CDDP/LPD, and it resolved spontaneously with appropriate medications. CONCLUSIONS: TACE with use of low-dose CDDP was efficacious for unresectable HCC and had few complications. TACE with use of CDDP may contribute to prolongation of the life span of patients with HCC versus TACE with use of ADM.
Authors: Janine Rennert; Ernst-Michael Jung; Andreas G Schreyer; Patrick Hoffstetter; Peter Heiss; Stefan Feuerbach; Niels Zorger Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2011-04-07 Impact factor: 5.742