OBJECTIVE: Nebulized amikacin may be an attractive option for the treatment of lung infections. Low systemic absorption may permit the use of high doses, leading to high lung concentrations without systemic toxicity. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of an optimized high-dose amikacin nebulization technique. DESIGN: in vitro and in vivo pharmacokinetic study. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Six healthy volunteers (age 21-30 years, weight 49-68 kg). INTERVENTIONS: The Aeroneb Pro nebulizer with an Idehaler vertical spacer was evaluated in a bench study. Amikacin was administered intravenously (15[Symbol: see text]mg/kg) and nebulized (40, 50, and 60[Symbol: see text]mg/kg) during noninvasive pressure-support ventilation through a mouthpiece. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Median (interquartile range) in vitro inhaled fraction was 31% (30-32) and inhalable output was 681 mg/h (630-743). Serum concentrations after nebulization were less than or equal to those after infusion. The area under the serum concentration curve was significantly higher after infusion (138 mg h(-1)l(-1), 122-143) than after nebulization (49 mg h(-1)l(-1), 39-55, at 40 mg/kg; 63, 53-67 at 50; 66, 50-71, at 60). Peak serum concentration was also higher after infusion: 48 mg/l (45-49) after infusion compared to 8.2 (5.6-8.7), 9.2 (7.6-10.2), and 9.2 (5.2-10.3), respectively. Mean absorption times after nebulization were 2 h 24 min (2,07-2,45), 2 h 21 min (2,07-2,35), and 2 h 5 min (2,00-2,25), respectively. No side effect was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Nebulization of up to 60 mg/kg amikacin appears to be safe in healthy subjects and associated with lower serum concentrations than a 15 mg/kg infusion.
OBJECTIVE: Nebulized amikacin may be an attractive option for the treatment of lung infections. Low systemic absorption may permit the use of high doses, leading to high lung concentrations without systemic toxicity. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of an optimized high-dose amikacin nebulization technique. DESIGN: in vitro and in vivo pharmacokinetic study. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Six healthy volunteers (age 21-30 years, weight 49-68 kg). INTERVENTIONS: The Aeroneb Pro nebulizer with an Idehaler vertical spacer was evaluated in a bench study. Amikacin was administered intravenously (15[Symbol: see text]mg/kg) and nebulized (40, 50, and 60[Symbol: see text]mg/kg) during noninvasive pressure-support ventilation through a mouthpiece. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Median (interquartile range) in vitro inhaled fraction was 31% (30-32) and inhalable output was 681 mg/h (630-743). Serum concentrations after nebulization were less than or equal to those after infusion. The area under the serum concentration curve was significantly higher after infusion (138 mg h(-1)l(-1), 122-143) than after nebulization (49 mg h(-1)l(-1), 39-55, at 40 mg/kg; 63, 53-67 at 50; 66, 50-71, at 60). Peak serum concentration was also higher after infusion: 48 mg/l (45-49) after infusion compared to 8.2 (5.6-8.7), 9.2 (7.6-10.2), and 9.2 (5.2-10.3), respectively. Mean absorption times after nebulization were 2 h 24 min (2,07-2,45), 2 h 21 min (2,07-2,35), and 2 h 5 min (2,00-2,25), respectively. No side effect was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Nebulization of up to 60 mg/kg amikacin appears to be safe in healthy subjects and associated with lower serum concentrations than a 15 mg/kg infusion.
Authors: J Rello; J A Paiva; J Baraibar; F Barcenilla; M Bodi; D Castander; H Correa; E Diaz; J Garnacho; M Llorio; M Rios; A Rodriguez; J Solé-Violán Journal: Chest Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Jean C Dubus; Laurent Vecellio; Michele De Monte; James B Fink; Daniel Grimbert; Jerome Montharu; Chantal Valat; Neil Behan; Patrice Diot Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2005-03-17 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Dorisanne D Miller; Mohammad M Amin; Lucy B Palmer; Akbar R Shah; Gerald C Smaldone Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2003-07-31 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: A R Beaubien; S Desjardins; E Ormsby; A Bayne; K Carrier; M J Cauchy; R Henri; M Hodgen; J Salley; A St Pierre Journal: Am J Otolaryngol Date: 1989 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.808
Authors: Chris Stockmann; Jessica K Roberts; Venkata K Yellepeddi; Catherine M T Sherwin Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Stephan Ehrmann; Ferran Roche-Campo; Giuseppe Francesco Sferrazza Papa; Daniel Isabey; Laurent Brochard; Gabriela Apiou-Sbirlea Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2013-03-23 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Charles-Edouard Luyt; Marc Clavel; Kalpalatha Guntupalli; Jay Johannigman; John I Kennedy; Christopher Wood; Kevin Corkery; Dennis Gribben; Jean Chastre Journal: Crit Care Date: 2009-12-10 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: J Varshosaz; S Ghaffari; S F Mirshojaei; A Jafarian; F Atyabi; F Kobarfard; S Azarmi Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2013-08-01 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Jean-Louis Vincent; Matteo Bassetti; Bruno François; George Karam; Jean Chastre; Antoni Torres; Jason A Roberts; Fabio S Taccone; Jordi Rello; Thierry Calandra; Daniel De Backer; Tobias Welte; Massimo Antonelli Journal: Crit Care Date: 2016-05-17 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Massimo Antonelli; Elie Azoulay; Marc Bonten; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; Daniel De Backer; François Lemaire; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Goran Hedenstierna; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Salvatore M Maggiore; Alexandre Mebazaa; Philipp Metnitz; Jerôme Pugin; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2008-12-09 Impact factor: 17.440