Literature DB >> 18046510

Mutation rate and genome reduction in endosymbiotic and free-living bacteria.

Gabriel A B Marais1, Alexandra Calteau, Olivier Tenaillon.   

Abstract

Genome reduction has been considered the hallmark of endosymbiotic bacteria, such as endocellular mutualists or obligatory pathogens until it was found exactly the same in several free-living bacteria. In endosymbiotic bacteria genome reduction is mainly attributed to degenerative processes due to small population size. These cannot affect the free-living bacteria with reduced genomes because they are known to have very large population sizes. It has been proposed that selection for simplification drove genome reduction in these free-living bacteria. For at least one of them (Prochlorococcus), genome reduction is associated with accelerated evolution and we suggest an alternative hypothesis based on increase in mutation rate as the primary cause of genome reduction in free-living bacteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18046510     DOI: 10.1007/s10709-007-9226-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  29 in total

Review 1.  Origin and evolution of the mitochondrial proteome.

Authors:  C G Kurland; S G Andersson
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  Base composition bias might result from competition for metabolic resources.

Authors:  Eduardo P C Rocha; Antoine Danchin
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  Acceleration of genomic evolution caused by enhanced mutation rate in endocellular symbionts.

Authors:  Takeshi Itoh; William Martin; Masatoshi Nei
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The error threshold.

Authors:  Christof K Biebricher; Manfred Eigen
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.303

5.  Phosphate acquisition genes in Prochlorococcus ecotypes: evidence for genome-wide adaptation.

Authors:  Adam C Martiny; Maureen L Coleman; Sallie W Chisholm
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Evolution of high mutation rates in experimental populations of E. coli.

Authors:  P D Sniegowski; P J Gerrish; R E Lenski
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-06-12       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The accumulation of deleterious genes in a population--Muller's Ratchet.

Authors:  J Haigh
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 1.570

8.  Accelerated evolution associated with genome reduction in a free-living prokaryote.

Authors:  Alexis Dufresne; Laurence Garczarek; Frédéric Partensky
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2005-01-14       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  DNA alkylation repair limits spontaneous base substitution mutations in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  W J Mackay; S Han; L D Samson
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Different spectra of stationary-phase mutations in early-arising versus late-arising mutants of Pseudomonas putida: involvement of the DNA repair enzyme MutY and the stationary-phase sigma factor RpoS.

Authors:  Signe Saumaa; Andres Tover; Lagle Kasak; Maia Kivisaar
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  30 in total

1.  Flavin-dependent thymidylate synthase X limits chromosomal DNA replication.

Authors:  Frédéric Escartin; Stéphane Skouloubris; Ursula Liebl; Hannu Myllykallio
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Genome reduction by deletion of paralogs in the marine cyanobacterium Prochlorococcus.

Authors:  Haiwei Luo; Robert Friedman; Jijun Tang; Austin L Hughes
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Differential gene retention in plastids of common recent origin.

Authors:  Adrian Reyes-Prieto; Hwan Su Yoon; Ahmed Moustafa; Eun Chan Yang; Robert A Andersen; Sung Min Boo; Takuro Nakayama; Ken-ichiro Ishida; Debashish Bhattacharya
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 4.  Hypermutation and stress adaptation in bacteria.

Authors:  R Jayaraman
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.166

5.  Excess of non-conservative amino acid changes in marine bacterioplankton lineages with reduced genomes.

Authors:  Haiwei Luo; Yongjie Huang; Ramunas Stepanauskas; Jijun Tang
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 17.745

Review 6.  Reductive genome evolution at both ends of the bacterial population size spectrum.

Authors:  Bérénice Batut; Carole Knibbe; Gabriel Marais; Vincent Daubin
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 60.633

7.  The microbiome: Composition and locations.

Authors:  Megan S Kennedy; Eugene B Chang
Journal:  Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 3.622

8.  The evolution of sex: A new hypothesis based on mitochondrial mutational erosion: Mitochondrial mutational erosion in ancestral eukaryotes would favor the evolution of sex, harnessing nuclear recombination to optimize compensatory nuclear coadaptation.

Authors:  Justin C Havird; Matthew D Hall; Damian K Dowling
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.345

9.  Distinct, ecotype-specific genome and proteome signatures in the marine cyanobacteria Prochlorococcus.

Authors:  Sandip Paul; Anirban Dutta; Sumit K Bag; Sabyasachi Das; Chitra Dutta
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  A genomic analysis of the archaeal system Ignicoccus hospitalis-Nanoarchaeum equitans.

Authors:  Mircea Podar; Iain Anderson; Kira S Makarova; James G Elkins; Natalia Ivanova; Mark A Wall; Athanasios Lykidis; Kostantinos Mavromatis; Hui Sun; Matthew E Hudson; Wenqiong Chen; Cosmin Deciu; Don Hutchison; Jonathan R Eads; Abraham Anderson; Fillipe Fernandes; Ernest Szeto; Alla Lapidus; Nikos C Kyrpides; Milton H Saier; Paul M Richardson; Reinhard Rachel; Harald Huber; Jonathan A Eisen; Eugene V Koonin; Martin Keller; Karl O Stetter
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 13.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.