PURPOSE: To determine the influence of diabetes mellitus (DM) type 1 and type 2 on the thickness, radius of curvature, power, and asphericity of the cornea. METHODS: In this observational cross-sectional study, 102 patients with DM type 1, 101 patients with DM type 2, and 69 healthy subjects were measured by means of Scheimpflug imaging to determine central corneal thickness and the radius and asphericity of the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces. Corneal power was calculated from these parameters. Several systemic parameters (eg, duration of diabetes, glycated hemoglobin, blood glucose levels, and type of medication) and ocular comorbidity (eg, stage of retinopathy) were recorded. RESULTS: Patients with DM type 1 and 2 had significantly smaller posterior corneal radii (P < 0.05) than those of healthy subjects (men: 6.49/6.48/6.64 mm; women: 6.36/6.30/6.49 mm). As a result, the optical power of the posterior corneal surface of the patients with diabetes differed from that of the healthy subjects (P < 0.01; men: DM, -6.2 D; healthy, -6.0 D; women: DM, -6.3 D; healthy, -6.2 D). However, corneal thickness, anterior radius and asphericity, and overall corneal power did not differ significantly between the groups. Furthermore, none of the systemic factors or ocular comorbidity had any influence on the corneal thickness or shape. CONCLUSIONS: DM affects the posterior corneal radius, resulting in a small change in posterior corneal power. However, chronic DM does not seem to significantly influence the overall corneal power.
PURPOSE: To determine the influence of diabetes mellitus (DM) type 1 and type 2 on the thickness, radius of curvature, power, and asphericity of the cornea. METHODS: In this observational cross-sectional study, 102 patients with DM type 1, 101 patients with DM type 2, and 69 healthy subjects were measured by means of Scheimpflug imaging to determine central corneal thickness and the radius and asphericity of the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces. Corneal power was calculated from these parameters. Several systemic parameters (eg, duration of diabetes, glycated hemoglobin, blood glucose levels, and type of medication) and ocular comorbidity (eg, stage of retinopathy) were recorded. RESULTS:Patients with DM type 1 and 2 had significantly smaller posterior corneal radii (P < 0.05) than those of healthy subjects (men: 6.49/6.48/6.64 mm; women: 6.36/6.30/6.49 mm). As a result, the optical power of the posterior corneal surface of the patients with diabetes differed from that of the healthy subjects (P < 0.01; men: DM, -6.2 D; healthy, -6.0 D; women: DM, -6.3 D; healthy, -6.2 D). However, corneal thickness, anterior radius and asphericity, and overall corneal power did not differ significantly between the groups. Furthermore, none of the systemic factors or ocular comorbidity had any influence on the corneal thickness or shape. CONCLUSIONS:DM affects the posterior corneal radius, resulting in a small change in posterior corneal power. However, chronic DM does not seem to significantly influence the overall corneal power.
Authors: X Adnan; Marwan Suheimat; Nathan Efron; Katie Edwards; Nicola Pritchard; Ankit Mathur; Edward A H Mallen; David A Atchison Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2015-02-04 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Muhammad Z Chauhan; Peyton A Rather; Sajida M Samarah; Abdelrahman M Elhusseiny; Ahmed B Sallam Journal: Cells Date: 2022-06-17 Impact factor: 7.666
Authors: Nery Garcia-Porta; Paulo Fernandes; Antonio Queiros; Jose Salgado-Borges; Manuel Parafita-Mato; Jose Manuel González-Méijome Journal: ISRN Ophthalmol Date: 2014-03-04