Literature DB >> 18043139

Benefits of pulsatile perfusion on vital organ recovery during and after pediatric open heart surgery.

Tijen Alkan1, Atf Akçevin, Akif Undar, Halil Türkoğlu, Tufan Paker, Aydn Aytaç.   

Abstract

Controversy continues concerning the utilization of pulsatile flow during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) procedures with regard to improved patient outcomes. We evaluated 215 consecutive pediatric patients undergoing open heart surgery for repair of congenital heart disease who were prospectively entered into the study and randomly assigned to either the pulsatile perfusion group (group P, n = 151) or the nonpulsatile perfusion group (group NP, n = 64). All patients received identical surgical, perfusional, and postoperative care. Major complications and clinical outcome were documented. There were no statistically significant differences seen in either preoperative or operative parameters between the two groups (age, body surface area, weight, X-clamp and CPB time, base flow, flow rates, and hemofiltration). Group P, compared with group NP, had significantly less inotropic support (number of agents 1.4 +/- 0.07 vs. 2 +/- 0.12, p = 0.0012; dopamine 7.14 +/- 0.28 vs. 9.04 +/- 0.42 microg 32 x kg x min, p = 0.00025; dobutamine 4.12 +/- 0.3 vs. 5.3 +/- 0.6 microg 32 x kg x min, p = 0.036), adrenalin (0.026 +/- 0.005 vs. 0.046 +/- 0.005 microg 32 x kg x min, p = 0.021), shorter intubation period (10.26 +/- 1.04 vs. 18.64 +/- 1.99 hours, p = 0.021), shorter duration of intensive care unit (ICU) (1.53 +/- 0.07 vs. 2.75 +/- 1.19 days, p = 0.012), and hospital stay (6.71 +/- 0.19 vs. 11.16 +/- 0.58 days, p = 0.002). Although there were no significant differences in either creatinine, enzyme levels, and drainage amounts between two groups, lower lactate levels 16.27 +/- 2.02 vs. 24.66 +/- 3.05 mg/dl, p = 0.00034), higher albumine levels (3.15 +/- 0.03 vs. 2.95 +/- 0.06 mg/dl, p = 0.046), and higher urine output (602.82 +/- 21.5 vs. 505.55 +/- 34.2 ml/d, p = 0.016) during ICU period was observed in group P compared with group NP, respectively. We concluded that the use of pulsatile flow resulted in improved patient outcomes in terms of preserving better cardiac, renal, and pulmonary functions in the early post-CPB period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18043139     DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e31814fb506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASAIO J        ISSN: 1058-2916            Impact factor:   2.872


  9 in total

1.  Effects of pulsatile perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass on biochemical markers and kidney function in patients undergoing cardiac surgeries.

Authors:  Alireza Mohammadzadeh; Naser Jafari; Mohammad Hasanpour; Soheil Sahandifar; Masoud Ghafari; Vahed Alaei
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2013-08-16

2.  International conference on pediatric mechanical circulatory support systems and pediatric cardiopulmonary perfusion: outcomes and future directions.

Authors:  Akif Undar
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.872

3.  A meta-analysis of renal benefits to pulsatile perfusion in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Alicia Sievert; Joseph Sistino
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2012-03

4.  Penn State Hershey--center for pediatric cardiovascular research.

Authors:  Akif Undar; Linda Pauliks; Joseph Brian Clark; Jeffrey Zahn; Gerson Rosenberg; Allen R Kunselman; Qi Sun; Kerem Pekkan; Kenneth Saliba; Elizabeth Carney; Neal Thomas; Willard Freeman; Kent Vrana; Aly El-Banayosy; Serdar H Ural; Ronald Wilson; Todd M Umstead; Joanna Floros; David S Phelps; William Weiss; Alan Snyder; Sung Yang; Stephen Kimatian; Stephen E Cyran; Vernon M Chinchilli; Yulong Guan; Alan Rider; Nikkole Haines; Ashley Rogerson; Tijen Alkan-Bozkaya; Atif Akcevin; Kyung Sun; Shigang Wang; Long Cun; John L Myers
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.094

5.  A novel, low cost, disposable, pediatric pulsatile rotary ventricular pump for cardiac surgery that provides a physiological flow pattern.

Authors:  Daniel E Mazur; Kathryn R Osterholzer; John M Toomasian; Scott I Merz
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 6.  Clinical outcomes of pulsatile and non-pulsatile mode of perfusion.

Authors:  Nikkole Haines; Shigang Wang; Akif Undar; Tijen Alkan; Atif Akcevin
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2009-03

7.  A novel rotary pulsatile flow pump for cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Nicholas R Teman; Daniel E Mazur; John Toomasian; Emilia Jahangir; Fares Alghanem; Marcus Goudie; Alvaro Rojas-Peña; Jonathan W Haft
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

8.  The outcome of pediatric patients undergoing congenital cardiac surgery under pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass in different frequencies.

Authors:  Guanhua Li; Wen Jiang; Yu Zhang; Xiaohua Zhang; Jimei Chen; Jian Zhuang; Chengbin Zhou
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 2.423

9.  Effects on the pulmonary hemodynamics and gas exchange with a speed modulated right ventricular assist rotary blood pump: a numerical study.

Authors:  Feng Huang; Zhe Gou; Yang Fu; Xiaodong Ruan
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 2.819

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.