BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment is mostly regarded as the core symptom of dementia, but several other domains (such as daily functioning) are equally relevant to assess the severity of dementia. The relationship between these domains is unclear. The Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) is a relatively unexplored instrument in people with dementia, measuring severity by direct observation. OBJECTIVE: To study the relationship between the AMPS and scores on several commonly used outcome measures for the assessment of dementia severity, and to examine the possible influence of neuropsychiatric symptoms on these relationships in patients with cognitive disorders. METHODS: Cross-sectional data of 118 patients with cognitive disorders were used; data on cognition (Mini-Mental State Examination, MMSE; CAMCOG), global severity (Global Deterioration Scale, GDS), daily life functioning (Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, IADL), and neuropsychiatric symptoms (Neuropsychiatric Inventory, NPI) were collected and analyzed using correlation and regression analyses. Different combinations of the severity measures were tested for their ability to predict the AMPS process ability scores. RESULTS: Scores on the MMSE, CAMCOG and GDS were moderately associated with the AMPS process ability score. These measures explained between 27 and 44% of the variance in the AMPS score. The presence of apathy influenced the association between the cognitive measures and the AMPS score. CONCLUSION: Commonly used measures of dementia severity are only moderately associated with observation of performance on daily activities. This underlines the need for direct observation of daily activities in dementia patients. This relationship between several approaches of assessing dementia severity needs further study. (c) 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.
BACKGROUND:Cognitive impairment is mostly regarded as the core symptom of dementia, but several other domains (such as daily functioning) are equally relevant to assess the severity of dementia. The relationship between these domains is unclear. The Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) is a relatively unexplored instrument in people with dementia, measuring severity by direct observation. OBJECTIVE: To study the relationship between the AMPS and scores on several commonly used outcome measures for the assessment of dementia severity, and to examine the possible influence of neuropsychiatric symptoms on these relationships in patients with cognitive disorders. METHODS: Cross-sectional data of 118 patients with cognitive disorders were used; data on cognition (Mini-Mental State Examination, MMSE; CAMCOG), global severity (Global Deterioration Scale, GDS), daily life functioning (Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, IADL), and neuropsychiatric symptoms (Neuropsychiatric Inventory, NPI) were collected and analyzed using correlation and regression analyses. Different combinations of the severity measures were tested for their ability to predict the AMPS process ability scores. RESULTS: Scores on the MMSE, CAMCOG and GDS were moderately associated with the AMPS process ability score. These measures explained between 27 and 44% of the variance in the AMPS score. The presence of apathy influenced the association between the cognitive measures and the AMPS score. CONCLUSION: Commonly used measures of dementia severity are only moderately associated with observation of performance on daily activities. This underlines the need for direct observation of daily activities in dementiapatients. This relationship between several approaches of assessing dementia severity needs further study. (c) 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Authors: Tania Giovannetti; Priscilla Britnell; Laura Brennan; Andrew Siderowf; Murray Grossman; David J Libon; Brianne M Bettcher; Francesca Rouzard; Joel Eppig; Gregory A Seidel Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2012-05-24 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Kathryn E Saatman; Ann-Christine Duhaime; Ross Bullock; Andrew I R Maas; Alex Valadka; Geoffrey T Manley Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Anke Persoon; Liesbeth Joosten-Weyn Banningh; Wim van de Vrie; Marcel G M Olde Rikkert; Theo van Achterberg Journal: ISRN Nurs Date: 2011-07-17
Authors: Régis Bordet; Ralf Ihl; Amos D Korczyn; Giuseppe Lanza; Jelka Jansa; Robert Hoerr; Alla Guekht Journal: BMC Med Date: 2017-05-24 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: David S Miller; Philippe Robert; Larry Ereshefsky; Lawrence Adler; Daniel Bateman; Jeff Cummings; Steven T DeKosky; Corinne E Fischer; Masud Husain; Zahinoor Ismail; Judith Jaeger; Alan J Lerner; Abby Li; Constantine G Lyketsos; Valeria Manera; Jacobo Mintzer; Hans J Moebius; Moyra Mortby; Didier Meulien; Stephane Pollentier; Anton Porsteinsson; Jill Rasmussen; Paul B Rosenberg; Myuri T Ruthirakuhan; Mary Sano; Carla Zucchero Sarracini; Krista L Lanctôt Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2021-05-05 Impact factor: 16.655