Literature DB >> 18042495

Automatic independent component labeling for artifact removal in fMRI.

Jussi Tohka1, Karin Foerde, Adam R Aron, Sabrina M Tom, Arthur W Toga, Russell A Poldrack.   

Abstract

Blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signals in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) are often small compared to the level of noise in the data. The sources of noise are numerous including different kinds of motion artifacts and physiological noise with complex patterns. This complicates the statistical analysis of the fMRI data. In this study, we propose an automatic method to reduce fMRI artifacts based on independent component analysis (ICA). We trained a supervised classifier to distinguish between independent components relating to a potentially task-related signal and independent components clearly relating to structured noise. After the components had been classified as either signal or noise, a denoised fMR time-series was reconstructed based only on the independent components classified as potentially task-related. The classifier was a novel global (fixed structure) decision tree trained in a Neyman-Pearson (NP) framework, which allowed the shape of the decision regions to be controlled effectively. Additionally, the conservativeness of the classifier could be tuned by modifying the NP threshold. The classifier was tested against the component classifications by an expert with the data from a category learning task. The test set as well as the expert were different from the data used for classifier training and the expert labeling the training set. The misclassification rate was between 0.2 and 0.3 for both the event-related and blocked designs and it was consistent among variety of different NP thresholds. The effects of denoising on the group-level statistical analyses were as expected: The denoising generally decreased Z-scores in the white matter, where extreme Z-values can be expected to reflect artifacts. A similar but weaker decrease in Z-scores was observed in the gray matter on average. These two observations suggest that denoising was likely to reduce artifacts from gray matter and could be useful to improve the detection of activations. We conclude that automatic ICA-based denoising offers a potentially useful approach to improve the quality of fMRI data and consequently increase the accuracy of the statistical analysis of these data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18042495      PMCID: PMC2374836          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  40 in total

1.  Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Peter Bannister; Michael Brady; Stephen Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  What is the best similarity measure for motion correction in fMRI time series?

Authors:  L Freire; A Roche; J F Mangin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Detection of eye movements from fMRI data.

Authors:  Michael S Beauchamp
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Isolation and minimization of head motion-induced signal variations in fMRI data using independent component analysis.

Authors:  Rui Liao; Martin J McKeown; Jeffrey L Krolik
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  CORSICA: correction of structured noise in fMRI by automatic identification of ICA components.

Authors:  Vincent Perlbarg; Pierre Bellec; Jean-Luc Anton; Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac; Julien Doyon; Habib Benali
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 6.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Dissociating valence of outcome from behavioral control in human orbital and ventral prefrontal cortices.

Authors:  John O'Doherty; Hugo Critchley; Ralf Deichmann; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-08-27       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Analysis of fMRI data by blind separation into independent spatial components.

Authors:  M J McKeown; S Makeig; G G Brown; T P Jung; S S Kindermann; A J Bell; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Cortex-based independent component analysis of fMRI time series.

Authors:  Elia Formisano; Fabrizio Esposito; Francesco Di Salle; Rainer Goebel
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 10.  Independent component analysis of functional MRI: what is signal and what is noise?

Authors:  Martin J McKeown; Lars Kai Hansen; Terrence J Sejnowsk
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.627

View more
  119 in total

1.  Lateral prefrontal cortex contributes to maladaptive decisions.

Authors:  Gui Xue; Chi-Hung Juan; Chi-Fu Chang; Zhong-Lin Lu; Qi Dong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Striatal dopamine D₂/D₃ receptors mediate response inhibition and related activity in frontostriatal neural circuitry in humans.

Authors:  Dara G Ghahremani; Buyean Lee; Chelsea L Robertson; Golnaz Tabibnia; Andrew T Morgan; Natalie De Shetler; Amira K Brown; John R Monterosso; Adam R Aron; Mark A Mandelkern; Russell A Poldrack; Edythe D London
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Resting developments: a review of fMRI post-processing methodologies for spontaneous brain activity.

Authors:  Daniel S Margulies; Joachim Böttger; Xiangyu Long; Yating Lv; Clare Kelly; Alexander Schäfer; Dirk Goldhahn; Alexander Abbushi; Michael P Milham; Gabriele Lohmann; Arno Villringer
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Performance comparison of machine learning algorithms and number of independent components used in fMRI decoding of belief vs. disbelief.

Authors:  P K Douglas; Sam Harris; Alan Yuille; Mark S Cohen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Effect of modafinil on learning and task-related brain activity in methamphetamine-dependent and healthy individuals.

Authors:  Dara G Ghahremani; Golnaz Tabibnia; John Monterosso; Gerhard Hellemann; Russell A Poldrack; Edythe D London
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 7.853

6.  Cardiorespiratory effects on default-mode network activity as measured with fMRI.

Authors:  Mariët van Buuren; Thomas E Gladwin; Bram B Zandbelt; Martijn van den Heuvel; Nick F Ramsey; René S Kahn; Matthijs Vink
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  He who is well prepared has half won the battle: an FMRI study of task preparation.

Authors:  Anna Manelis; Lynne M Reder
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Intergroup social influence on emotion processing in the brain.

Authors:  Lynda C Lin; Yang Qu; Eva H Telzer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Longitudinal changes of amygdala and default mode activation in adolescents prenatally exposed to cocaine.

Authors:  Zhihao Li; Claire D Coles; Mary Ellen Lynch; Yuejia Luo; Xiaoping Hu
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.763

10.  Evaluating the effects of systemic low frequency oscillations measured in the periphery on the independent component analysis results of resting state networks.

Authors:  Yunjie Tong; Lia M Hocke; Lisa D Nickerson; Stephanie C Licata; Kimberly P Lindsey; Blaise deB Frederick
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.