Literature DB >> 18041994

Time to talk, time to see: changing microeconomies of professional practice among nurses and doctors in Australian general practice.

Christine Phillips1, Kathryn Dwan, Christopher Pearce, Sally Hall, Julie Porritt, Rachel Yates, Bonnie Sibbald.   

Abstract

In Australia, more nurses are entering general practice, and nurses' work is being funded in increasingly complex ways through Medicare. Little research has explored the ways doctors and nurses realign their priorities and activities when working together in general practice. We undertook rapid, intensive multimethod studies of 25 general practices to explore the ways in which the labour of nurses and doctors was structured, and the implicit decisions made by both professions about the values placed on different ways of working and on their time. Data collected included photographs, floor-plans, interviews with 37 nurses, 24 doctors and 22 practice managers, and 50 hours of structured observation. Nursing time was constructed by both nurses and doctors as being fluid and non-contingent; they were regarded as being 'available' to patients in a way that doctors were not. Compared to medical time, nursing time could be disposed more flexibly, underpinning a valorized attribute of nursing: deep clinical and personal contact with patients. The location of practice nurses' desks in areas of traffic, such as administrative stations, or in the treatment room, underpinned this valuable unstructured contact with patients. Changes to the practice nurse role through direct fee-for-service items for nurses may lead to greater congruence between the microeconomies of nursing and medicine in general practice. In a time of pressure upon a primary care workforce, this is likely to lead to more independent clinical work by nurses, but may also lead to a decrease in flexible contact with patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18041994     DOI: 10.5172/conu.2007.26.1.136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Nurse        ISSN: 1037-6178            Impact factor:   1.787


  4 in total

1.  Australian nurses in general practice, enabling the provision of cervical screening and well women's health care services: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jane Mills; Jennifer Chamberlain-Salaun; Leane Christie; Margot Kingston; Elise Gorman; Caroline Harvey
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2012-11-12

2.  Using qualitative mixed methods to study small health care organizations while maximising trustworthiness and authenticity.

Authors:  Christine B Phillips; Kathryn Dwan; Julie Hepworth; Christopher Pearce; Sally Hall
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  A systematic review of experiences of advanced practice nursing in general practice.

Authors:  Michael Jakimowicz; Danielle Williams; Grazyna Stankiewicz
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2017-01-18

4.  Outcomes associated with nurse practitioners in collaborative practice with general practitioners in rural settings in Canada: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Alison Roots; Marjorie MacDonald
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2014-12-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.