Literature DB >> 18040883

Impact of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures on utility: results from a patient-based and a population-based sample.

N M van Schoor1, S K Ewing, T W O'Neill, M Lunt, J H Smit, P Lips.   

Abstract

Data are scarce on the impact of vertebral fractures (VFX) on utility. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of prevalent and incident VFX on utility in both a patient-based and population-based sample. Data from the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) study (n = 550 for prevalent VFX and n = 174 for incident VFX) and the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS) (n = 236) were used. Utility was assessed by the index score of the EQ-5D. In the MORE study, highly statistically significant associations were found between utility and the presence of prevalent VFX (p < 0.001), number of prevalent VFX (p < 0.001), severity of prevalent VFX (p < 0.001), the combination of number and severity of prevalent VFX (p = 0.001) and location of prevalent VFX (p = 0.019). The mean utility was significantly lower among women who suffered an incident VFX (utility = 0.67) than among women who did not (utility = 0.77) (p = 0.005), although utility loss was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.142). In EPOS, the combination of number and severity of incident VFX was significantly related to utility (p = 0.030). In conclusion, utility is lower among persons with prevalent and incident VFX, especially in a patient-based sample. Utility loss was not significantly different between women without and with incident VFX.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18040883     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-007-9287-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  23 in total

1.  The influence of osteoporotic fractures on health-related quality of life in community-dwelling men and women across Canada.

Authors:  J D Adachi; G Loannidis; C Berger; L Joseph; A Papaioannou; L Pickard; E A Papadimitropoulos; W Hopman; S Poliquin; J C Prior; D A Hanley; W P Olszynski; T Anastassiades; J P Brown; T Murray; S A Jackson; A Tenenhouse
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  A case-control study of quality of life and functional impairment in women with long-standing vertebral osteoporotic fracture.

Authors:  S E Hall; R A Criddle; T L Comito; R L Prince
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Quality of life in patients with vertebral fractures: validation of the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO). Working Party for Quality of Life of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis.

Authors:  P Lips; C Cooper; D Agnusdei; F Caulin; P Egger; O Johnell; J A Kanis; S Kellingray; A Leplege; U A Liberman; E McCloskey; H Minne; J Reeve; J Y Reginster; M Scholz; C Todd; M C de Vernejoul; I Wiklund
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states.

Authors:  P Dolan
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Health-related quality of life in economic evaluations for osteoporosis: whose values should we use?

Authors:  S E Gabriel; T S Kneeland; L J Melton; M M Moncur; B Ettinger; A N Tosteson
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1999 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Defining incident vertebral deformities in population studies: a comparison of morphometric criteria.

Authors:  M Lunt; A A Ismail; D Felsenberg; C Cooper; J A Kanis; J Reeve; A J Silman; T W O'Neill
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Impact of vertebral deformities, osteoarthritis, and other chronic diseases on quality of life: a population-based study.

Authors:  N M van Schoor; J H Smit; J W R Twisk; P Lips
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-10-12       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Prevalent vertebral deformities: relationship to bone mineral density and spinal osteophytosis in elderly men and women.

Authors:  G Jones; C White; T Nguyen; P N Sambrook; P J Kelly; J A Eisman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Health-related quality of life and radiographic vertebral fracture.

Authors:  W Cockerill; M Lunt; A J Silman; C Cooper; P Lips; A K Bhalla; J B Cannata; R Eastell; D Felsenberg; C Gennari; O Johnell; J A Kanis; C Kiss; P Masaryk; M Naves; G Poor; H Raspe; D M Reid; J Reeve; J Stepan; C Todd; A D Woolf; T W O'Neill
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  The assessment of vertebral deformity: a method for use in population studies and clinical trials.

Authors:  E V McCloskey; T D Spector; K S Eyres; E D Fern; N O'Rourke; S Vasikaran; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  7 in total

1.  Health state utility values and patient-reported outcomes before and after vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in an osteoporosis clinical trial.

Authors:  T Imai; S Tanaka; K Kawakami; T Miyazaki; H Hagino; M Shiraki
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Health-related quality of life in patients with osteoporosis in the absence of vertebral fracture: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Wilson; C A Sharp; M W J Davie
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Predicting EQ-5D-US and SF-6D societal health state values from the Osteoporosis Assessment Questionnaire.

Authors:  C M McDonough; M R Grove; A D Elledge; A N A Tosteson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Public health impact of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Jane A Cauley
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 6.053

5.  Prevalence of vertebral fractures in women and men in the population-based Tromsø Study.

Authors:  Svanhild Waterloo; Luai A Ahmed; Jacqueline R Center; John A Eisman; Bente Morseth; Nguyen D Nguyen; Tuan Nguyen; Anne J Sogaard; Nina Emaus
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 6.  An updated systematic review of Health State Utility Values for osteoporosis related conditions.

Authors:  T Peasgood; K Herrmann; J A Kanis; J E Brazier
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Previous vertebral compression fractures add to the deterioration of the disability and quality of life after an acute compression fracture.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Suzuki; Osamu Ogikubo; Tommy Hansson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 3.134

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.