Literature DB >> 18039593

Changes in motor cortical excitability induced by high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of different stimulation durations.

Se Hee Jung1, Jae Eun Shin, Yong-Seol Jeong, Hyung-Ik Shin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the changes in cortical excitability of the human motor cortex induced by high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of different stimulation durations.
METHODS: Twenty healthy subjects participated in the study. Subjects received 20 trains of 10-Hz rTMS at 80% of the resting motor threshold (RMT) intensity with two different stimulation durations (5 and 1.5s) over the motor hot spot for left first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle. Electromyographic responses (motor-evoked potentials, MEPs) to single-pulse stimulation, and intracortical inhibition (ICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) by paired-pulse stimulation were measured bilaterally in the relaxed FDI muscles before, immediately after, and 30, 60, 90 and 120 min after rTMS.
RESULTS: After 5s of 10-Hz rTMS, the mean amplitude of MEP for the stimulated M1 cortex decreased for up to 90min (P=0.002) and that of the unstimulated M1 cortex decreased for up to 60 min (P=0.008). Enhancement of ICI and suppression of ICF were observed and sustained for more than 90 min in both stimulated (P=0.001) and unstimulated (P=0.003) M1 cortex after 5s of 10-Hz rTMS. After 1.5s of 10-Hz rTMS, the mean amplitude of MEP increased in stimulated cortex for up to 120 min (P=0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: With different stimulation durations, high-frequency subthreshold rTMS can produce different patterns of long-lasting changes in corticospinal and intracortical excitability in stimulated and unstimulated motor cortex in healthy subjects. SIGNIFICANCE: The results have important implications for the selection of stimulation parameters other than the frequency of rTMS. The clinical application of rTMS for the purpose of motor enhancement should be considered along with the mechanism of different stimulation parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18039593     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.09.124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  19 in total

Review 1.  Brain Stimulation in Addiction.

Authors:  Michael C Salling; Diana Martinez
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 2.  Sensorimotor Integration During Motor Learning: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies.

Authors:  Zeliha Matur; A Emre Öge
Journal:  Noro Psikiyatr Ars       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.339

Review 3.  Evidence of Neuroplastic Changes after Transcranial Magnetic, Electric, and Deep Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Julius Kricheldorff; Katharina Göke; Maximilian Kiebs; Florian H Kasten; Christoph S Herrmann; Karsten Witt; Rene Hurlemann
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-07-15

Review 4.  The Problem and Potential of TMS' Infinite Parameter Space: A Targeted Review and Road Map Forward.

Authors:  Kevin A Caulfield; Joshua C Brown
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 5.435

5.  NMDA receptor partial agonist, d-cycloserine, enhances 10 Hz rTMS-induced motor plasticity, suggesting long-term potentiation (LTP) as underlying mechanism.

Authors:  Joshua C Brown; William H DeVries; Jeffrey E Korte; Gregory L Sahlem; Leonardo Bonilha; E Baron Short; Mark S George
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  Simply longer is not better: reversal of theta burst after-effect with prolonged stimulation.

Authors:  Olga Lucía Gamboa; Andrea Antal; Vera Moliadze; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Associative plasticity in intracortical inhibitory circuits in human motor cortex.

Authors:  Heike Russmann; Jean-Charles Lamy; Ejaz A Shamim; Sabine Meunier; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-05-10       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  The effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on gamma oscillatory activity in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Mera S Barr; Faranak Farzan; Tamara Arenovich; Robert Chen; Paul B Fitzgerald; Zafiris J Daskalakis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Performance improvements from imagery: evidence that internal visual imagery is superior to external visual imagery for slalom performance.

Authors:  Nichola Callow; Ross Roberts; Lew Hardy; Dan Jiang; Martin Gareth Edwards
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 10.  Potential Mechanisms Supporting the Value of Motor Cortex Stimulation to Treat Chronic Pain Syndromes.

Authors:  Marcos F DosSantos; Natália Ferreira; Rebecca L Toback; Antônio C Carvalho; Alexandre F DaSilva
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.