Literature DB >> 18038955

Hits and false positives in face matching: a familiarity-based dissociation.

Aamed M Megreya1, A Mike Burton.   

Abstract

In recognition memory for unfamiliar faces, performance for target-present items (hits) does not correlate with performance for target-absent items (false positives), a result which runs counter to the more usual mirror effect. In this paper we examinesubjects' performance on fac e matching, a nd demonstrate no relationship-between performance on matching items and performance on nonmatching items. This absence of a mirror effect occurs for multidistractor, 1-in-10 matching tasks (Experiment 1) and for simple paired-item tasks (Experiment 2). In Experiment 3 we demonstrate that matching familiar faces produces a strong mirror effect. However, inverting the familiar faces causes the association to disappear once more (Experiment 4). We argue thatfamiliar and unfamiliar faces are represented in qualitatively different ways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18038955     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193954

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  27 in total

1.  Infrequent identity mismatches are frequently undetected.

Authors:  Megan H Papesh; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Oxytocin increases bias, but not accuracy, in face recognition line-ups.

Authors:  Sarah Bate; Rachel Bennetts; Benjamin A Parris; Markus Bindemann; Robert Udale; Amanda Bussunt
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 3.  Stable face representations.

Authors:  Rob Jenkins; A Mike Burton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Statistical feature training improves fingerprint-matching accuracy in novices and professional fingerprint examiners.

Authors:  Bethany Growns; Alice Towler; James D Dunn; Jessica M Salerno; N J Schweitzer; Itiel E Dror
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-07-16

5.  The perception of a familiar face is no more than the sum of its parts.

Authors:  Jason M Gold; Jarrett D Barker; Shawn Barr; Jennifer L Bittner; Alexander Bratch; W Drew Bromfield; Roy A Goode; Mary Jones; Doori Lee; Aparna Srinath
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-12

6.  Generalization across view in face memory and face matching.

Authors:  Alejandro J Estudillo; Markus Bindemann
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2014-11-24

7.  Passport officers' errors in face matching.

Authors:  David White; Richard I Kemp; Rob Jenkins; Michael Matheson; A Mike Burton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Face averages enhance user recognition for smartphone security.

Authors:  David J Robertson; Robin S S Kramer; A Mike Burton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Feature-by-feature comparison and holistic processing in unfamiliar face matching.

Authors:  Ahmed M Megreya
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Fraudulent ID using face morphs: Experiments on human and automatic recognition.

Authors:  David J Robertson; Robin S S Kramer; A Mike Burton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.