OBJECTIVE: Delivery by a skilled birth attendant (SBA) serves as an indicator of progress towards reducing maternal mortality worldwide -- the fifth Millennium Development Goal. Though WHO tracks the proportion of women delivered by SBAs, we know little about their competence to manage common life-threatening obstetric complications. We assessed SBA competence in five high maternal mortality settings as a basis for initiating quality improvement. METHODS: The WHO Integrated Management of Pregnancy and Childbirth (IMPAC) guidelines served as our competency standard. Evaluation included a written knowledge test, partograph (used to record all observations of a woman in labour) case studies and assessment of procedures demonstrated on anatomical models at five skills stations. We tested a purposive sample of 166 SBAs in Benin, Ecuador, Jamaica and Rwanda (Phase I). These initial results were used to refine the instruments, which were then used to evaluate 1358 SBAs throughout Nicaragua (Phase II). FINDINGS: On average, Phase I participants were correct for 56% of the knowledge questions and 48% of the skills steps. Phase II participants were correct for 62% of the knowledge questions. Their average skills scores by area were: active management of the third stage of labour -- 46%; manual removal of placenta -- 52%; bimanual uterine compression -- 46%; immediate newborn care -- 71%; and neonatal resuscitation -- 55%. CONCLUSION: There is a wide gap between current evidence-based standards and provider competence to manage selected obstetric and neonatal complications. We discuss the significance of that gap, suggest approaches to close it and describe briefly current efforts to do so in Ecuador, Nicaragua and Niger.
OBJECTIVE: Delivery by a skilled birth attendant (SBA) serves as an indicator of progress towards reducing maternal mortality worldwide -- the fifth Millennium Development Goal. Though WHO tracks the proportion of women delivered by SBAs, we know little about their competence to manage common life-threatening obstetric complications. We assessed SBA competence in five high maternal mortality settings as a basis for initiating quality improvement. METHODS: The WHO Integrated Management of Pregnancy and Childbirth (IMPAC) guidelines served as our competency standard. Evaluation included a written knowledge test, partograph (used to record all observations of a woman in labour) case studies and assessment of procedures demonstrated on anatomical models at five skills stations. We tested a purposive sample of 166 SBAs in Benin, Ecuador, Jamaica and Rwanda (Phase I). These initial results were used to refine the instruments, which were then used to evaluate 1358 SBAs throughout Nicaragua (Phase II). FINDINGS: On average, Phase I participants were correct for 56% of the knowledge questions and 48% of the skills steps. Phase II participants were correct for 62% of the knowledge questions. Their average skills scores by area were: active management of the third stage of labour -- 46%; manual removal of placenta -- 52%; bimanual uterine compression -- 46%; immediate newborn care -- 71%; and neonatal resuscitation -- 55%. CONCLUSION: There is a wide gap between current evidence-based standards and provider competence to manage selected obstetric and neonatal complications. We discuss the significance of that gap, suggest approaches to close it and describe briefly current efforts to do so in Ecuador, Nicaragua and Niger.
Authors: J McDermott; D Beck; S T Buffington; J Annas; G Supratikto; D Prenggono; F M Sri Ekonomi; E Achadi Journal: J Midwifery Womens Health Date: 2001 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.388
Authors: Mario R Festin; Pisake Lumbiganon; Jorge E Tolosa; Kathryn A Finney; Katherine Ba-Thike; Tsungai Chipato; Hernando Gaitán; Liangzhi Xu; Sompop Limpongsanurak; Suneeta Mittal; Abraham Peedicayil; Noor Pramono; Manorama Purwar; Sheela Shenoy; Sean Daly Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2003-05-16 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: S A Harvey; P Ayabaca; M Bucagu; S Djibrina; W N Edson; S Gbangbade; A McCaw-Binns; B R Burkhalter Journal: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 3.561
Authors: Marguerite Hoyler; Samuel R G Finlayson; Craig D McClain; John G Meara; Lars Hagander Journal: World J Surg Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Gary L Darmstadt; Anne C C Lee; Simon Cousens; Lynn Sibley; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; France Donnay; Dave Osrin; Abhay Bang; Vishwajeet Kumar; Steven N Wall; Abdullah Baqui; Joy E Lawn Journal: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 3.561
Authors: Beena D Kamath-Rayne; Jennifer B Griffin; Katelin Moran; Bonnie Jones; Allan Downs; Elizabeth M McClure; Robert L Goldenberg; Doris Rouse; Alan H Jobe Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2015-08
Authors: J Frederik Frøen; Sanne J Gordijn; Hany Abdel-Aleem; Per Bergsjø; Ana Betran; Charles W Duke; Vincent Fauveau; Vicki Flenady; Sven Gudmund Hinderaker; G Justus Hofmeyr; Abdul Hakeem Jokhio; Joy Lawn; Pisake Lumbiganon; Mario Merialdi; Robert Pattinson; Anuraj Shankar Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2009-12-17 Impact factor: 3.007