Literature DB >> 18037873

Active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer: who, how and why?

Laurence Klotz1.   

Abstract

Active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer has become increasingly common in populations in which screening for prostate cancer is widespread, owing to evidence that in many patients screening results in the detection of disease that is not clinically significant (i.e. untreated, it would not pose a threat to health). The approach is supported by data demonstrating that patients who have clinically insignificant disease can be identified with reasonable accuracy, and that patients who are initially classified as low risk but reclassified over time as higher risk and are treated radically are still cured in most cases. It is important to identify patients who have a low probability of disease progression during their lifetime according to clinical and pathologic features of the disease, patient age and comorbidity. Close monitoring of patients over time and availability of reasonable criteria for intervention, which will both identify more-aggressive disease in a timely fashion and not result in excessive treatment, are crucial. It is also important to communicate appropriately with the patient, to reduce the psychological burden of living with untreated cancer. The results of active surveillance, the criteria for patient selection and the appropriate thresholds for intervention are reviewed in this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18037873     DOI: 10.1038/ncponc0966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Oncol        ISSN: 1743-4254


  8 in total

Review 1.  Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: an update.

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk; Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Watchful waiting and quality of life among prostate cancer survivors in the Physicians' Health Study.

Authors:  Julie L Kasperzyk; William V Shappley; Stacey A Kenfield; Lorelei A Mucci; Tobias Kurth; Jing Ma; Meir J Stampfer; Martin G Sanda
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  [Active surveillance for prostate cancer].

Authors:  M Graefen; S Ahyai; R Heuer; G Salomon; T Schlomm; H Isbarn; L Budäus; H Heinzer; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  [Immunohistochemical algorithms in prostate diagnostics: what's new?].

Authors:  G Kristiansen
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.011

5.  Active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer: a short review.

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk; Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-10-21

6.  Early experience with active surveillance in low-risk prostate cancer treated.

Authors:  Ji Yong Ha; Byung Hoon Kim; Choal Hee Park; Chun Il Kim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2014-03-13

7.  Can we negotiate with a tumor?

Authors:  Claire M Wolfrom; Michel Laurent; Jean Deschatrette
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  IVIM Parameters on MRI Could Predict ISUP Risk Groups of Prostate Cancers on Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Chun-Bi Chang; Yu-Chun Lin; Yon-Cheong Wong; Shin-Nan Lin; Chien-Yuan Lin; Yu-Han Lin; Ting-Wen Sheng; Chen-Chih Huang; Lan-Yan Yang; Li-Jen Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 6.244

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.