Literature DB >> 19795124

[Immunohistochemical algorithms in prostate diagnostics: what's new?].

G Kristiansen1.   

Abstract

Immunohistochemistry has become an indispensible tool in biopsy diagnostics of prostate tissues. In particular the use of basal cell markers can be useful to differentiate benign and malignant lesions as a lack of basal cells is considered a hallmark of malignancy. Basal cell cytokeratins and p63 have therefore a long standing place in the diagnostic portfolio of most genito-urinary pathologists. However, to complement the use of these negative markers by additional positive immunohistochemistry markers of malignancy would be desirable to further increase diagnostic accuracy. The most widely used positive marker is alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR), which is strongly upregulated in prostate cancer and which can even be combined with p63 in a single immunostaining. This article briefly and critically reviews current diagnostic prostate cancer biomarkers and also suggests golgi phosphoprotein 2 (GOLPH2) and fatty acid synthase (FASN) as additional diagnostic markers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19795124     DOI: 10.1007/s00292-009-1230-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathologe        ISSN: 0172-8113            Impact factor:   1.011


  43 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic markers under watchful waiting and radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Lars Holmberg; Anna Bill-Axelson; Hans Garmo; Juni Palmgren; Bo Johan Norlén; Hans Olov Adami; Jan Erik Johansson
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.722

2.  Identification of differentially expressed genes in human prostate cancer using subtraction and microarray.

Authors:  J Xu; J A Stolk; X Zhang; S J Silva; R L Houghton; M Matsumura; T S Vedvick; K B Leslie; R Badaro; S G Reed
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Use of keratin 903 as an adjunct in the diagnosis of prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  L Hedrick; J I Epstein
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 6.394

4.  Fatty acid synthase gene overexpression and copy number gain in prostate adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Uzma S Shah; Rajiv Dhir; Susanne M Gollin; Uma R Chandran; Dale Lewis; Marie Acquafondata; Beth R Pflug
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 3.466

5.  Golgi protein GOLM1 is a tissue and urine biomarker of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sooryanarayana Varambally; Bharathi Laxman; Rohit Mehra; Qi Cao; Saravana M Dhanasekaran; Scott A Tomlins; Jill Granger; Adaikkalam Vellaichamy; Arun Sreekumar; Jianjun Yu; Wenjuan Gu; Ronglai Shen; Debashis Ghosh; Lorinda M Wright; Raleigh D Kladney; Rainer Kuefer; Mark A Rubin; Claus J Fimmel; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.715

6.  Long-term assessment of prostate cancer progression free survival: evaluation of pathological parameters, nuclear shape and molecular biomarkers of pathogenesis.

Authors:  Robert W Veltri; Sumit Isharwal; M Craig Miller; Jonathan I Epstein; Leslie A Mangold; Elizabeth Humphreys; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 4.104

7.  Keratin immunoreactivity in the benign and neoplastic human prostate.

Authors:  M K Brawer; D M Peehl; T A Stamey; D G Bostwick
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Aberrant diffuse expression of p63 in adenocarcinoma of the prostate on needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy: report of 21 cases.

Authors:  Adeboye O Osunkoya; Donna E Hansel; Xinlai Sun; George J Netto; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 9.  Active surveillance for favorable risk prostate cancer: rationale, risks, and results.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.498

10.  GOLPH2 protein expression as a novel tissue biomarker for prostate cancer: implications for tissue-based diagnostics.

Authors:  G Kristiansen; F R Fritzsche; K Wassermann; C Jäger; A Tölls; M Lein; C Stephan; K Jung; C Pilarsky; M Dietel; H Moch
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  [Value of biomarkers in urology].

Authors:  P J Goebell; B Keck; S Wach; B Wullich
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  [Diagnostic histopathology of prostate cancer].

Authors:  G Kristiansen
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Cancer biomarker discovery: the entropic hallmark.

Authors:  Regina Berretta; Pablo Moscato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Global expression of AMACR transcripts predicts risk for prostate cancer - a systematic comparison of AMACR protein and mRNA expression in cancerous and noncancerous prostate.

Authors:  Saeid Alinezhad; Riina-Minna Väänänen; Natalia Tong Ochoa; Emily A Vertosick; Anders Bjartell; Peter J Boström; Pekka Taimen; Kim Pettersson
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 2.264

5.  Golgi protein 73, hepatocellular carcinoma and other types of cancers.

Authors:  Yanan Wang; Yu-Jui Yvonne Wan
Journal:  Liver Res       Date:  2020-09-25

Review 6.  The Evolving Clinical Management of Genitourinary Cancers Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Sudeh Izadmehr; Dara J Lundon; Nihal Mohamed; Andrew Katims; Vaibhav Patel; Benjamin Eilender; Reza Mehrazin; Ketan K Badani; John P Sfakianos; Che-Kai Tsao; Peter Wiklund; William K Oh; Carlos Cordon-Cardo; Ashutosh K Tewari; Matthew D Galsky; Natasha Kyprianou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Markers for detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Raymond A Clarke; Horst J Schirra; James W Catto; Martin F Lavin; Robert A Gardiner
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 8.  Alterations of Lipid Metabolism in Cancer: Implications in Prognosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Lara P Fernández; Marta Gómez de Cedrón; Ana Ramírez de Molina
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 6.244

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.