Literature DB >> 18037665

Immunohistochemical markers as predictive tools for breast cancer.

R A Walker1.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is the predominant malignancy where oncologists use predictive markers clinically to select treatment options, with steroid receptors having been used for many years. Immunohistochemistry has taken over as the major assay method used for assessing markers. Despite its extensive use there are still issues around tissue fixation, methodology, interpretation and quantification. Although many markers have been evaluated, the oestrogen receptor remains the most reliable and best example of a predictor of treatment response. It is of major importance clinically that those undertaking interpretation of predictive markers understand the technical pitfalls and are aware of how expression of a particular marker relates to breast cancer pathology. A false negative or a false positive result will impact on patient management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18037665     DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2006.041830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  18 in total

1.  Regression of ductal carcinoma in situ after treatment with acupuncture.

Authors:  Regina Dehen
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 2.579

2.  Med1 plays a critical role in the development of tamoxifen resistance.

Authors:  Arumugam Nagalingam; Mourad Tighiouart; Lisa Ryden; Leena Joseph; Goran Landberg; Neeraj K Saxena; Dipali Sharma
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 4.944

3.  Invasive ductular carcinoma in 2 rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Amanda P Beck; Amos Brooks; Caroline J Zeiss
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 0.982

4.  Correlation Of Bi-Rads 4 Subcategories Breast Lesions On Tomosynthesis And Histopathological Examination With P63 Immunohistochemistry Expression.

Authors:  H Lalchhanhimi; V Pavithra; Dev Bhawna; Sheela Chinnappan; Harini Gnanavel; Sai Venkata
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-04-07

5.  Ki-67 and caspase expression in breast carcinoma: does variance in locational sampling exist?

Authors:  Filinte Deniz; Kaymakci Dilek; Mollamemisoglu Hande; Ugurlu M Umit; Kaya Handan
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-09-01

6.  Histological grading of breast cancer on needle core biopsy: the role of immunohistochemical assessment of proliferation.

Authors:  T'ng Chang Kwok; Emad A Rakha; Andrew H S Lee; Matthew Grainge; Andrew R Green; Ian O Ellis; Desmond G Powe
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.087

7.  Integrative investigation on breast cancer in ER, PR and HER2-defined subgroups using mRNA and miRNA expression profiling.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Dai; Ana Chen; Zhonghu Bai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  SHOULD FISH TEST BE PERFORMED TO ALL PATIENTS WITH BREAST CANCER?

Authors:  Hasan Mutlu; Halit Karaca; Zeki Akca; Yasemin Altuner Torun
Journal:  Med Sci (Turkey)       Date:  2013-06-01

9.  Identification of prognostic factors in canine mammary malignant tumours: a multivariable survival study.

Authors:  Andreia A Santos; Célia C Lopes; Jorge R Ribeiro; Liliana R Martins; Joana C Santos; Irina F Amorim; Fátima Gärtner; Augusto J Matos
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 2.741

10.  Joint detection of multiple immunohistochemical indices and clinical significance in breast cancer.

Authors:  En-Qi Qiao; Minghua Ji; Jianzhong Wu; Jian Li; Xinyu Xu; Rong Ma; Xiaohua Zhang; Yuejun He; Quanbin Zha; Xue Song; Liwei Zhu; Ji-Hai Tang
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-05-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.