PURPOSE: To determine whether maintaining HGB levels > or = 12.0 g/dL with recombinant human erythropoietin (R-HUEPO) compared to "standard" treatment (transfusion for HGB < or = 10.0 g/dL) improves progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and local control (LC) in women receiving concurrent weekly cisplatin and radiation (CT/RT) for carcinoma of the cervix. In addition, to determine whether platinum-DNA adducts were associated with clinical characteristics or outcome. METHODS:Patients with stage IIB-IVA cervical cancer and HGB < 14.0 g/dL were randomly assigned to CT/RT+/-R-HUEPO (40,000 units s.c. weekly). R-HUEPO was stopped if HGB > 14.0 g/dL. Endpoints were PFS, OS and LC. Platinum-DNA adducts were quantified using immunocytochemistry assay in buccal cells. RESULTS:Between 08/01 and 09/03, 109 of 114 patients accrued were eligible. Fifty-two received CT/RT and 57 CT/RT+R-HUEPO. The study closed prematurely, with less than 25% of the planned accrual, due to potential concerns for thromboembolic event (TE) with R-HUEPO. Median follow-up was 37 months (range 9.8-50.4 months). PFS and OS at 3 years should be 65% and 75% for CT/RT and 58% and 61% for CT/RT+R-HUEPO, respectively. TE occurred in 4/52 receiving CT/RT and 11/57 with CT/RT+R-HUEPO, not all considered treatment related. No deaths occurred from TE. High-platinum adducts were associated with inferior PFS and LC. CONCLUSION:TE is common in cervical cancer patients receiving CT/RT. Difference in TE rate between the two treatments was not statistically significant. The impact of maintaining HGB level > 12.0 g/dL on PFS, OS and LC remains undetermined.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To determine whether maintaining HGB levels > or = 12.0 g/dL with recombinant humanerythropoietin (R-HUEPO) compared to "standard" treatment (transfusion for HGB < or = 10.0 g/dL) improves progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and local control (LC) in women receiving concurrent weekly cisplatin and radiation (CT/RT) for carcinoma of the cervix. In addition, to determine whether platinum-DNA adducts were associated with clinical characteristics or outcome. METHODS:Patients with stage IIB-IVA cervical cancer and HGB < 14.0 g/dL were randomly assigned to CT/RT+/-R-HUEPO (40,000 units s.c. weekly). R-HUEPO was stopped if HGB > 14.0 g/dL. Endpoints were PFS, OS and LC. Platinum-DNA adducts were quantified using immunocytochemistry assay in buccal cells. RESULTS: Between 08/01 and 09/03, 109 of 114 patients accrued were eligible. Fifty-two received CT/RT and 57 CT/RT+R-HUEPO. The study closed prematurely, with less than 25% of the planned accrual, due to potential concerns for thromboembolic event (TE) with R-HUEPO. Median follow-up was 37 months (range 9.8-50.4 months). PFS and OS at 3 years should be 65% and 75% for CT/RT and 58% and 61% for CT/RT+R-HUEPO, respectively. TE occurred in 4/52 receiving CT/RT and 11/57 with CT/RT+R-HUEPO, not all considered treatment related. No deaths occurred from TE. High-platinum adducts were associated with inferior PFS and LC. CONCLUSION: TE is common in cervical cancerpatients receiving CT/RT. Difference in TE rate between the two treatments was not statistically significant. The impact of maintaining HGB level > 12.0 g/dL on PFS, OS and LC remains undetermined.
Authors: Brian Leyland-Jones; Vladimir Semiglazov; Marek Pawlicki; Tadeusz Pienkowski; Sergei Tjulandin; George Manikhas; Antoly Makhson; Anton Roth; David Dodwell; Jose Baselga; Mikhail Biakhov; Konstantinas Valuckas; Edouard Voznyi; Xiangyang Liu; Els Vercammen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-08-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: James R Wright; Yee C Ung; Jim A Julian; Kathleen I Pritchard; Timothy J Whelan; Column Smith; Barbara Szechtman; Wilson Roa; Liam Mulroy; Leona Rudinskas; Bruno Gagnon; Gord S Okawara; Mark N Levine Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-02-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: J H Schellens; J Ma; A S Planting; M E van der Burg; E van Meerten; M de Boer-Dennert; P I Schmitz; G Stoter; J Verweij Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 1996-06 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Peter G Rose; James J Java; Charles W Whitney; Frederick B Stehman; Rachelle Lanciano; Gillian M Thomas Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2014-08-23 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Maria E Cabanillas; Hagop Kantarjian; Deborah A Thomas; Gloria N Mattiuzzi; Michael E Rytting; Eduardo Bruera; Lianchun Xiao; B Nebiyou Bekele; Maria C Foudray; Jorge E Cortes Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-07-12 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Lindsay L Morgenstern Warner; Sean C Dowdy; Janice R Martin; Maureen A Lemens; Michaela E McGree; Amy L Weaver; Karl C Podratz; Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Hee Chul Park; Nora A Janjan; Tito R Mendoza; Edward H Lin; Saroj Vadhan-Raj; Mandeep Hundal; Yiqun Zhang; Marc E Delclos; Christopher H Crane; Prajnan Das; Xin Shelley Wang; Charles S Cleeland; Sunil Krishnan Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2009-02-21 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Johan Vansteenkiste; Michael Hedenus; Pere Gascon; Carsten Bokemeyer; Heinz Ludwig; Jan Vermorken; Lisa Hamilton; Ken Bridges; Beatriz Pujol Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2009-09-03 Impact factor: 4.430