Literature DB >> 18037172

Time pressure leads to inhibitory control deficits in impulsive violent offenders.

Chiao-Yun Chen1, Neil G Muggleton, Chi-Hung Juan, Ovid J L Tzeng, Daisy L Hung.   

Abstract

Impulsive violent criminal behavior is often ascribed to problems with behavioral control. Such behavior could be a consequence of stronger pre-potent responses or a failure of inhibitory control. A countermanding task which allows dissociation of these two processes was used to examine whether impulsive violent offenders were found to exhibit impaired inhibitory control. An experiment with a time restriction on responding was performed to effectively limit the ability of the subjects to strategically control their error rate. The results showed that the performance of the impulsive violent offenders was only impaired in the time pressure condition. These findings suggest that impulsive violent behavior may be linked to abnormal modulation of the frontal cortical areas, areas thought to be involved in response inhibition by negative feedback or emotional responses, rather than frontal dysfunction per se.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18037172     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.10.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  8 in total

1.  Neurocognitive deficits in male alcoholics: an ERP/sLORETA analysis of the N2 component in an equal probability Go/NoGo task.

Authors:  A K Pandey; C Kamarajan; Y Tang; D B Chorlian; B N Roopesh; N Manz; A Stimus; M Rangaswamy; B Porjesz
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.251

2.  Open vs. closed skill sports and the modulation of inhibitory control.

Authors:  Chun-Hao Wang; Che-Chien Chang; Yen-Ming Liang; Chun-Ming Shih; Wen-Sheng Chiu; Philip Tseng; Daisy L Hung; Ovid J L Tzeng; Neil G Muggleton; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Post-error action control is neurobehaviorally modulated under conditions of constant speeded response.

Authors:  Takahiro Soshi; Kumiko Ando; Takamasa Noda; Kanako Nakazawa; Hideki Tsumura; Takayuki Okada
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Differences in Inhibitory Control between Impulsive and Premeditated Aggression in Juvenile Inmates.

Authors:  Zhuo Zhang; Qianglong Wang; Xu Liu; Ping Song; Bo Yang
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  The Predictive Value of Impulsivity and Risk-Taking Measures for Substance Use in Substance Dependent Offenders.

Authors:  Nathalie M Rieser; Lilach Shaul; Matthijs Blankers; Maarten W J Koeter; Gerard M Schippers; Anna E Goudriaan
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 3.558

6.  To Go or Not to Go: Degrees of Dynamic Inhibitory Control Revealed by the Function of Grip Force and Early Electrophysiological Indices.

Authors:  Trung Van Nguyen; Che-Yi Hsu; Satish Jaiswal; Neil G Muggleton; Wei-Kuang Liang; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  The comparisons of inhibitory control and post-error behaviors between different types of athletes and physically inactive adults.

Authors:  Chia-Chuan Yu; Neil G Muggleton; Chiao-Yun Chen; Cheng-Hung Ko; Suyen Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Reduced brain activation in violent adolescents during response inhibition.

Authors:  Yi Qiao; Yi Mei; XiaoXia Du; Bin Xie; Yang Shao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.