Literature DB >> 18035495

Validity of 24-h recall ratings of pain severity: biasing effects of "Peak" and "End" pain.

Mark P Jensen1, Jack Mardekian, Mani Lakshminarayanan, Mark E Boye.   

Abstract

Despite the frequent use of pain recall ratings in clinical research, there remains doubt about the ability of individuals to accurately recall their pain. In particular, previous research indicates the possibility that the most pain experienced during a recall period and the most recent pain experienced (known as peak and end effects, respectively) might bias recall ratings. The current study used data from a published clinical trial to determine the relative validity of a 24-h recall rating of average post-operative pain and the nature and extent of any biasing influence of peak and end effects on nine separate 24-h recall ratings. The results supported a statistically significant but small biasing influence of both peak and end pain. Also, the influence of peak pain was stronger than that of end pain. However, the biasing impact of both peak and end pain together was very small, suggesting that 24-h recall ratings are adequately valid indicants of average pain for patients participating in post-surgery clinical pain trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18035495     DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  22 in total

1.  Validity of average, minimum, and maximum end-of-day recall assessments of pain and fatigue.

Authors:  Arthur A Stone; Joan E Broderick; Joseph E Schwartz
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  Peak and end effects in patients' daily recall of pain and fatigue: a within-subjects analysis.

Authors:  Stefan Schneider; Arthur A Stone; Joseph E Schwartz; Joan E Broderick
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.820

3.  Improvements in pain outcomes in a Canadian pediatric teaching hospital following implementation of a multifaceted knowledge translation initiative.

Authors:  Lisa M Zhu; Jennifer Stinson; Lori Palozzi; Kevin Weingarten; Mary-Ellen Hogan; Silvia Duong; Ricardo Carbajal; Fiona A Campbell; Anna Taddio
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.037

4.  Predicting Pain and Disability After Shoulder Arthroscopy: Rotator Cuff Tear Severity and Concomitant Arthroscopic Procedures.

Authors:  Corey B Simon; Rogelio A Coronado; Warren H Greenfield; Carolina Valencia; Thomas W Wright; Michael W Moser; Kevin W Farmer; Steven Z George
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.442

5.  Agreement between prospective diary data and retrospective questionnaire report of abdominal pain and stooling symptoms in children with irritable bowel syndrome.

Authors:  M M Self; A E Williams; D I Czyzewski; E M Weidler; R J Shulman
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.598

6.  Can End-of-day reports replace momentary assessment of pain and fatigue?

Authors:  Joan E Broderick; Joseph E Schwartz; Stefan Schneider; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 5.820

7.  Does ultrasound correlate with surgical or histologic findings in greater trochanteric pain syndrome? A pilot study.

Authors:  A M Fearon; J M Scarvell; J L Cook; P N Smith
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Catastrophizing and depressive symptoms as prospective predictors of outcomes following total knee replacement.

Authors:  Robert R Edwards; Jennifer A Haythornthwaite; Michael T Smith; Brendan Klick; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.037

9.  Movement restriction does not modulate sensory and perceptual effects of exercise-induced arm pain.

Authors:  Markus Hübscher; Simon Tu; Tasha Stanton; G Lorimer Moseley; Benedict M Wand; John Booth; James H McAuley
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Temporal trends in symptom experience predict the accuracy of recall PROs.

Authors:  Stefan Schneider; Joan E Broderick; Doerte U Junghaenel; Joseph E Schwartz; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 3.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.