Literature DB >> 18035096

A framework for quality improvement: an analysis of factors responsible for improvement at hospitals participating in the Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes with Early Implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines (CRUSADE) quality improvement initiative.

Seth W Glickman1, William Boulding, Richard Staelin, Jyotsna Mulgund, Matthew T Roe, Barbara L Lytle, John S Rumsfeld, W Brian Gibler, E Magnus Ohman, Kevin A Schulman, Eric D Peterson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hospitals are under increasing pressure to improve their quality of care. However, a key question remains: how can hospitals best design and implement successful quality improvement (QI) programs? Hospitals currently employ a variety of QI initiatives but have little empirical evidence on which to base their quality efforts.
METHODS: We designed and applied a hospital cross-sectional survey to 212 hospitals participating in CRUSADE (Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes with Early Implementation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines), a voluntary QI initiative of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE ACS). We factor analysis and an ordinary least squares regression model to determine the key hospital factors most associated with unexpected improvements in institutional QI in the treatment of NSTE ACS.
RESULTS: From 2002 to 2004, the following factors had a significant association with unexpected increases in the 2004 QI in NSTE ACS treatment: the use of CRUSADE QI tools, clinical commitment to quality by a cardiology coadvocate, institutional financial commitment to quality, and barriers to QI related to resource availability and cultural resistance to change (all P < .10). Of these factors, optimal use of CRUSADE QI tools was associated with the highest absolute improvement in process adherence score relative to other factors.
CONCLUSIONS: We identified several institutional factors associated with improved quality of care in the treatment of high-risk NSTE ACS. We hope that this evidence-based framework will help guide the development and implementation of future QI programs in order to improve the institutional quality of care for NSTE ACS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18035096     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  7 in total

Review 1.  The influence of context on quality improvement success in health care: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Heather C Kaplan; Patrick W Brady; Michele C Dritz; David K Hooper; W Matthew Linam; Craig M Froehle; Peter Margolis
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 2.  Improving cardiovascular outcomes using electronic health records.

Authors:  Mazen Roumia; Steven Steinhubl
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Health resource variability in the achievement of optimal performance and clinical outcome in ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  Partha Sardar; Amartya Kundu; Ramez Nairooz; Saurav Chatterjee; Gary S Ledley; Wilbert S Aronow
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Women of child-bearing age have better inhospital cardiac arrest survival outcomes than do equal-aged men.

Authors:  Alexis A Topjian; A Russell Localio; Robert A Berg; Evaline A Alessandrini; Peter A Meaney; Paul E Pepe; G Luke Larkin; Mary Ann Peberdy; Lance B Becker; Vinay M Nadkarni
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Lessons learned from the CRUSADE National Quality Improvement Initiative.

Authors:  Eric D Peterson; David Z Bynum; Matthew T Roe
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Perception Versus Actual Performance in Timely Tissue Plasminogen Activation Administration in the Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Cheryl B Lin; Margueritte Cox; DaiWai M Olson; Gavin W Britz; Mark Constable; Gregg C Fonarow; Lee Schwamm; Eric D Peterson; Bimal R Shah
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 5.501

7.  A cross-sectional multicentre study of cardiac risk score use in the management of unstable angina and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Josien Engel; Ineke van der Wulp; Martine de Bruijne; Cordula Wagner
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.