Literature DB >> 18031640

A randomized pilot validation of educational measures in teaching shoulder arthroscopy to surgical residents.

Peter J M Ceponis1, Denise Chan, Richard S Boorman, Carol Hutchison, Nicholas G H Mohtadi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Injuries to the shoulder joint commonly require the attention of an orthopedic surgeon. Shoulder arthroscopy plays an increasingly important role in the diagnosis and repair of shoulder pathology; however, the most effective manner in which to teach orthopedic residents fundamental knowledge of diagnostic shoulder arthroscopy before entering the operating room is unclear. We aimed to compare the existing cadaver-based teaching of diagnostic shoulder arthroscopy knowledge with a method that combines model- and video-based teaching to orthopedic surgery residents in a randomized pilot trial.
METHODS: A composite (model/video teaching) method was designed, using prepared teaching videos and the commercially available ALEX shoulder arthroscopy model. First- and second-year orthopedic surgery residents from the University of Calgary were consented, surveyed for their arthroscopy experience and randomized to either cadaver or composite teaching. Subjects wrote a pretest before their teaching session and a posttest afterwards to assess their knowledge of diagnostic arthroscopy. The tests were multiple choice, containing text and pictorial-based questions. The posttest was modified to minimize recall bias. Subjects were also surveyed for their comments regarding the teaching sessions.
RESULTS: Nine of 10 subjects increased their test scores after the teaching sessions, with 4 of 5 in the cadaver-based and 5 of 5 in the composite groups. There were no differences between the teaching groups on their mean pre- or posttest scores. The composite group, but not the cadaver-based group, had a statistically significant increase in posttest scores. When the text- and pictorial-based question sections were analyzed separately, both groups significantly improved their mean text-based score, whereas only the composite group increased their mean pictorial-based questions score. Surveying the residents elicited positive comments regarding both manners of teaching.
CONCLUSION: This pilot trial suggests that a composite teaching curriculum is at least as effective as a cadaver-based environment for teaching orthopedic surgery residents fundamental knowledge of diagnostic shoulder arthroscopy.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18031640      PMCID: PMC2386192     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  17 in total

1.  Assessment of technical skills transfer from the bench training model to the human model.

Authors:  D J Anastakis; G Regehr; R K Reznick; M Cusimano; J Murnaghan; M Brown; C Hutchison
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  A comparison of operative times in arthroscopic ACL reconstruction between orthopaedic faculty and residents: the financial impact of orthopaedic surgical training in the operating room.

Authors:  L R Farnworth; D E Lemay; T Wooldridge; J D Mabrey; M J Blaschak; T A DeCoster; D C Wascher; R C Schenck
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2001

3.  Evaluation of a virtual reality simulator for arthroscopy skills development.

Authors:  Robert A Pedowitz; James Esch; Steve Snyder
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 4.  Controversies in arthroscopic shoulder surgery: arthroscopic versus open bankart repair, thermal treatment of capsular tissue, acromioplasties--are they necessary?

Authors:  Richard L Angelo
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 5.  Arthroscopic management of partial, full-thickness, and complex rotator cuff tears: indications, techniques, and complications.

Authors:  Eric S Millstein; Stephen J Snyder
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Use of computer-assisted learning module to achieve ACGME competencies in orthopaedic foot and ankle surgery.

Authors:  Ruth L Thomas; Ruth M Allen
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.827

7.  Arthroscopic proficiency: a survey of orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship directors and orthopaedic surgery department chairs.

Authors:  Patrick J O'Neill; Andrew J Cosgarea; Jason A Freedman; William S Queale; Edward G McFarland
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Initial evaluation of a shoulder arthroscopy simulator: establishing construct validity.

Authors:  Sakti Srivastava; Patricia L Youngblood; Chantal Rawn; Sanaz Hariri; W L Heinrichs; Amy L Ladd
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Office visits to orthopedic surgeons: United States, 1995-96.

Authors:  S M Schappert
Journal:  Adv Data       Date:  1998-09-28

10.  Challenges of teaching surgery: ethical framework.

Authors:  Asad J Raja; Alex V Levin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-06-10       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  9 in total

1.  Is there a valid and reliable assessment of diagnostic knee arthroscopy skill?

Authors:  Tyson Olson; Ryan Koehler; Aaron Butler; Simon Amsdell; Gregg Nicandri
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  The internal validity of arthroscopic simulators and their effectiveness in arthroscopic education.

Authors:  Jesse Alan Slade Shantz; Jeff R S Leiter; Tania Gottschalk; Peter Benjamin MacDonald
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  E-learning in orthopedic surgery training: A systematic review.

Authors:  Sandip P Tarpada; Matthew T Morris; Denver A Burton
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-09-21

4.  Impact of urology simulation boot camp in improving endoscopic instrument knowledge.

Authors:  Vishwanath Hanchanale; Mithun Kailavasan; Sanjay Rajpal; Philip Koenig; Marina Yiasemidou; Victor Palit; Karol Rogawski; Ian Eardley; Tim Terry; Sunjay Jain; Andrew Myatt; Chandra Shekhar Biyani
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2018-07-11

5.  Shoulder Arthroscopy Simulator Training Improves Surgical Procedure Performance: A Controlled Laboratory Study.

Authors:  Jordan Hauschild; Jessica C Rivera; Anthony E Johnson; Travis C Burns; Christopher J Roach
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-05-10

6.  Development of simulated arthroscopic skills.

Authors:  Christine Andersen; Trine N Winding; Martin S Vesterby
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Learner Preferences and Perceptions of Virtual Hand Surgery Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  John J Bartoletta; Katherine Hinchcliff; Peter Rhee
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 2.230

8.  Novice Surgeon Portal Preference to Visualize the Femoral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Footprint: The Accessory Medial Portal Offers Improved Visualization.

Authors:  Mehmet Burtaç Eren; Erkal Bilgiç
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-05-05

9.  Orthopedic surgery residents' perception of online education in their programs during the COVID-19 pandemic: should it be maintained after the crisis?

Authors:  Francisco Figueroa; David Figueroa; Rafael Calvo-Mena; Felipe Narvaez; Natalia Medina; Juan Prieto
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 3.717

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.