Literature DB >> 12098111

Evaluation of a virtual reality simulator for arthroscopy skills development.

Robert A Pedowitz1, James Esch, Steve Snyder.   

Abstract

We evaluated a virtual reality shoulder arthroscopy simulator using a standardized skills-assessment algorithm in 3 specific groups with various degrees of surgical expertise. The simulator (Mentice Corp, Gothenberg, Sweden) consists of a computer-based, dual-force feedback system with video monitor. Modeled structures include cartilage, labrum, ligaments, biceps tendon, and rotator cuff. The study included 3 groups of volunteers: group 1, medical students interviewing for orthopaedic residency (n = 35); group 2, orthopaedic residents interviewing for sports medicine fellowship (n = 22); and group 3, experienced faculty at a shoulder surgery course (n = 21). Data were collected anonymously and subjects completed a standardized test protocol designed to assess accuracy and efficiency. Subjects used the probe to "touch" a sphere that appeared at various locations within the joint (11 positions total). The sphere changed location immediately on contact with the tip of the probe. The following parameters were calculated by the computer: time (from touching the first ball until touching the eleventh ball), path ratio (percent of measured path length relative to the ideal path), collisions (number of times the probe / arthroscope contacted any tissue), and injuries (collisions beyond a threshold force). Test time and path ratio differed significantly as a function of surgical experience. There was no significant difference in probe collisions between the groups. Arthroscope collisions and injuries averaged 2 or less in all of the groups. There was significant correlation between path ratio and time to complete the test in groups 1 and 2 (r =.527 and r =.827, respectively, P <.001), but not in group 3 (r =.376, P =.10). There was essentially normal distribution of time performance in groups 1 and 2. Time was shorter and more consistent in group 3, suggesting greater consistency in the experienced surgeons. These data suggest that this arthroscopy simulator facilitates discrimination of arthroscopic skills. Computer-based simulation technology provides a major opportunity for surgical skills development without morbidity and operating room inefficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12098111     DOI: 10.1053/jars.2002.33791

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  34 in total

Review 1.  Virtual reality in orthopaedics: is it a reality?

Authors:  Jay D Mabrey; Karl D Reinig; W Dilworth Cannon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Global Rating Scales and Motion Analysis Are Valid Proficiency Metrics in Virtual and Benchtop Knee Arthroscopy Simulators.

Authors:  Justues Chang; Daniel C Banaszek; Jason Gambrel; Davide Bardana
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  A randomized pilot validation of educational measures in teaching shoulder arthroscopy to surgical residents.

Authors:  Peter J M Ceponis; Denise Chan; Richard S Boorman; Carol Hutchison; Nicholas G H Mohtadi
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 4.  Education in wrist arthroscopy: past, present and future.

Authors:  M C Obdeijn; N Bavinck; C Mathoulin; C M A M van der Horst; M P Schijven; G J M Tuijthof
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Evaluation of skills in arthroscopic training based on trajectory and force data.

Authors:  Yasutaka Tashiro; Hiromasa Miura; Yoshitaka Nakanishi; Ken Okazaki; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-13       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Validation of the ArthroS virtual reality simulator for arthroscopic skills.

Authors:  J J Stunt; G M M J Kerkhoffs; C N van Dijk; G J M Tuijthof
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  [Virtual arthroscopy : Gaming or training concept of the future].

Authors:  Stephan Reppenhagen; Manuel Weißenberger; Thomas Barthel; Maximilian Rudert; Hermann Anetzberger
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Efficacy and Validation of a Simulation-Based Compartment Syndrome Instructional Course.

Authors:  Saran Tantavisut; Josef N Tofte; Brian O Westerlind; Matthew D Karam; Phinit Phisitkul; John L Marsh
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2018

Review 9.  A Systematic Review on Orthopedic Simulators for Psycho-Motor Skill and Surgical Procedure Training.

Authors:  Darshan D Ruikar; Ravindra S Hegadi; K C Santosh
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 4.460

10.  Simulation in shoulder surgery.

Authors:  Henry B Colaço; Duncan Tennent
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-09-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.