| Literature DB >> 18031572 |
Gabriela Certad1,2, Tramy Ngouanesavanh1, Karine Guyot1, Nausicaa Gantois1, Thierry Chassat3, Anthony Mouray3, Laurence Fleurisse4, Anthony Pinon5, Jean-Charles Cailliez6, Eduardo Dei-Cas1,7, Colette Creusy4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cryptosporidiosis represents a major public health problem. This infection has been reported worldwide as a frequent cause of diarrhoea. Particularly, it remains a clinically significant opportunistic infection among immunocompromised patients, causing potentially life-threatening diarrhoea in HIV-infected persons. However, the understanding about different aspects of this infection such as invasion, transmission and pathogenesis is problematic. Additionally, it has been difficult to find suitable animal models for propagation of this parasite. Efforts are needed to develop reproducible animal models allowing both the routine passage of different species and approaching unclear aspects of Cryptosporidium infection, especially in the pathophysiology field.Entities:
Year: 2007 PMID: 18031572 PMCID: PMC2217515 DOI: 10.1186/1750-9378-2-22
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Agent Cancer ISSN: 1750-9378 Impact factor: 2.965
Experimental infection of Dexamethasone-treated or untreated SCID mice infected with C. parvum or C. muris: Main clinical and histopathological data
| Groupa | Mouse N° | Day of euthanasia (post-infection) | Oocysts/mg faeces at euthanasia | Clinical manifestations | Main histological changes |
| 1 | 20 | 0 | Occasional diarrhoea | Undetected | |
| 2 | 28 | 0 | Lethargy | Undetected | |
| 3 | 28 | 1 | None | N.D. | |
| 4 | 84 | 1 | Occasional diarrhoea | Undetected | |
| 5 | 84 | 4 | Occasional diarrhoea | Undetected | |
| 6 | 84 | 0 | Occasional diarrhoea | N.D. | |
| 7 | 20 | 29 | Occasional diarrhoea | Undetected | |
| 8 | 28 | 102 | Lethargy, ruffled coat | Undetected | |
| 9 | 28 | 95 | Lethargy, ruffled coat | N.D. | |
| 10 | 46 | 1182 | Lethargy, ruffled coat | Polyps with areas of low-grade and high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, and intramucosal adenocarcinoma at the ileocaecal region | |
| 11 | 62 | 240 | Lethargy, ruffled coat | Polyps with areas of low-grade and high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, and intramucosal adenocarcinoma at the ileocaecal region | |
| 12 | 84 | 695 | Lethargy, ruffled coat | Polyps with areas of low-grade and high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, and intramucosal adenocarcinoma at the ileocaecal region | |
| 13 | 20 | 1078 | None | Stomach heavily infected mainly at the fundic region; dilated glands; hyperplasia | |
| 14 | 20 | 407 | None | N.D. | |
| 15 | 28 | 742 | None | Stomach heavily infected mainly at the fundic glands, hyperplasia | |
| 16 | 84 | 4143 | None | Stomach heavily infected mainly at the fundic region; dilated glands; hyperplasia | |
| 17 | 84 | 4920 | None | Stomach heavily infected | |
| 18 | 84 | 5828 | None | None | |
| 19 | 20 | 1538 | Occasional diarrhoea | Stomach heavily infected; dilated glands | |
| 20 | 20 | 166 | Occasional diarrhoea | N.D. | |
| 21 | 27 | 1241 | Occasional diarrhoea | N.D. | |
| 22 | 32 | 4155 | Frequent diarrhoea, lethargy, ruffled coat | Stomach heavily infected mainly at the fundic glands; hyperplasia | |
| 23 | 46 | 900 | Lethargy, ruffled coat | Stomach heavily infected mainly at the fundic glands; hyperplasia | |
| 24 | 84 | 2051 | None | Stomach heavily infected mainly at the fundic glands; hyperplasia; a little inflammation | |
| 25 | 20 | 0 | None | Undetected | |
| 26 | 67 | 0 | Lethargy, ruffled coat | Undetected | |
| 27 | 84 | 0 | None | Undetected | |
| 28 | 20 | 0 | None | Undetected | |
| 29 | 43 | 0 | None | Undetected | |
| 30 | 84 | 0 | None | Undetected | |
| 31 | 54 | 0 | None | Undetected | |
| 32 | 54 | 0 | None | Undetected | |
| 33 | 54 | 0 | None | Undetected | |
| 34 | 54 | 0 | None | Undetected | |
| 35 | 54 | 0 | None | Undetected | |
| 36 | 54 | 0 | None | Undetected |
aExperimental groups were:
P: C. parvum-infected SCID mice; PDex: C. parvum-infected Dex-treated SCID mice; M: C. muris-infected SCID mice; MDex: C. muris-infected Dex-treated SCID mice; C: Not infected SCID mice of control group inoculated with PBS; CDex: Not infected Dex-treated SCID mice of control group inoculated with PBS; CDex2: Not infected Dex-treated SCID mice that received an inoculum from which oocysts were previously removed by filtration; N.D.: Not done (These mice were not included in the histological examination).
Figure 1Napierian logarithm of daily oocyst excretion (oocyst/mg faeces) in different groups of mice. Experimental groups were: P: C. parvum-infected SCID mice; PDex: C. parvum-infected Dex-treated SCID mice; M: C. muris-infected SCID mice; MDex: C. muris-infected Dex-treated SCID mice. Each box represents the middle half of data, the white line being the median. Whiskers represent the extreme values within 1.5 times the box height.
Figure 2Experimental . (A) Stomach section from a Dex-untreated SCID mouse euthanatized at day 84 post-infection; (B) Stomach section from a Dex-treated SCID mouse euthanatized at day 46 post-infection. In both cases, gastric glands are filled with numerous parasites at different developmental stages (arrows). No signs of inflammation. Hematoxylin & Eosin staining.
Figure 3Ileocaecal regions of mice from different groups. Normal caecum of (A) Uninfected mouse administered with dexamethasone (CDex group), (B) C. muris-infected Dex-treated mouse (MD group) and (C) C. parvum-infected mouse (P group). (D) Projection of polypoid structures with focal cystic dilation (arrows) developing inside the intestinal lumen of a C. parvum-infected Dex-treated SCID mouse. Hematoxylin & Eosin staining.
Figure 4Experimental . (A) Polyp with areas of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (arrow 1) and intramucosal adenocarcinoma (arrow 2); (B) Abnormal nuclear changes consisting of prominent nucleoli and irregularly scattered chromatin; (C) Highly irregular glands, areas of loss of glandular differentiation. Presence of numerous parasites (arrow); (D) Presence of numerous parasites at different developmental stages in the intestinal epithelium (arrow). Hematoxylin & Eosin staining.
Figure 5Experimental . Low (A, D) and high magnification (B, C) of the caecal region showing the presence of abundant parasites (arrow), and high degree dysplasia (arrow). Hematoxylin & Eosin staining.