Literature DB >> 18031525

Post-breeding information gathering and breeding territory shifts in northern wheatears.

Debora Arlt1, Tomas Pärt.   

Abstract

1. Prospecting non-breeding individuals have been shown to collect information on breeding sites a year ahead of breeding, but whether experienced breeders prospect future breeding sites is less well-known. Using data on post-breeding movements and between-year site shifts from a long-term population study of the migratory northern wheatear (Oenanthe oenanthe L.), we investigated (1) whether breeding territory selection of experienced breeders was a two-step process, made partly in the post-breeding period and partly at the time of territory establishment in the subsequent year; (2) predictions of which factors and cues correlate to site shifts at these two selection periods; and (3) consequences of territory shifts. 2. Many wheatears stayed close to their breeding site during the post-breeding period, but about 20% shifted to new potential breeding sites. Males that shifted to a new post-breeding location were also more likely to shift territory between years. 3. Factors linked to site shifts differed in the two investigated episodes of site selection. Post-breeding site shifts were linked to an environmental predictor of individual fitness, which is also related to foraging conditions (i.e. wheatears moved from tall to short field layers). Post-breeding site shifts, however, were not more frequent among young and failed breeders which may benefit most from prospecting for alternative breeding sites. Instead, in line with predictions of improving breeding conditions between-year site shifts were more frequent among young (only males) and failed breeders, whereas the link to territory field layer height disappeared. 4. Young males occupied more attractive sites and were more likely to breed successfully in year t + 1, but this improvement could also be expected from random choice. 5. Our results suggest that even though site shifts are determined partly during the post-breeding period, post-breeding movements of experienced breeders may be costly, especially when the breeding site is also a good foraging and moulting site in the post-breeding season. Under such circumstances an individual's choice of breeding site may often be determined at arrival in the subsequent year.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18031525     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01329.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  7 in total

1.  Decomposing the seasonal fitness decline.

Authors:  Meit Öberg; Tomas Pärt; Debora Arlt; Ane T Laugen; Matthew Low
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Rainfall during parental care reduces reproductive and survival components of fitness in a passerine bird.

Authors:  Meit Öberg; Debora Arlt; Tomas Pärt; Ane T Laugen; Sönke Eggers; Matthew Low
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Marked reduction in demographic rates and reduced fitness advantage for early breeding is not linked to reduced thermal matching of breeding time.

Authors:  Debora Arlt; Tomas Pärt
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Evidence of postbreeding prospecting in a long-distance migrant.

Authors:  Max Ciaglo; Ross Calhoun; Scott W Yanco; Michael B Wunder; Craig A Stricker; Brian D Linkhart
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Habitat-specific population growth of a farmland bird.

Authors:  Debora Arlt; Pär Forslund; Tobias Jeppsson; Tomas Pärt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effect of geolocators on migration and subsequent breeding performance of a long-distance passerine migrant.

Authors:  Debora Arlt; Matthew Low; Tomas Pärt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Why we should care about movements: Using spatially explicit integrated population models to assess habitat source-sink dynamics.

Authors:  Matthieu Paquet; Debora Arlt; Jonas Knape; Matthew Low; Pär Forslund; Tomas Pärt
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 5.606

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.