Literature DB >> 18031414

Google and the mind: predicting fluency with PageRank.

Thomas L Griffiths1, Mark Steyvers, Alana Firl.   

Abstract

Human memory and Internet search engines face a shared computational problem, needing to retrieve stored pieces of information in response to a query. We explored whether they employ similar solutions, testing whether we could predict human performance on a fluency task using PageRank, a component of the Google search engine. In this task, people were shown a letter of the alphabet and asked to name the first word beginning with that letter that came to mind. We show that PageRank, computed on a semantic network constructed from word-association data, outperformed word frequency and the number of words for which a word is named as an associate as a predictor of the words that people produced in this task. We identify two simple process models that could support this apparent correspondence between human memory and Internet search, and relate our results to previous rational models of memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18031414     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02027.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  32 in total

1.  Interrupted: The roles of distributed effort and incubation in preventing fixation and generating problem solutions.

Authors:  Ut Na Sio; Kenneth Kotovsky; Jonathan Cagan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-05

2.  Sleep on it, but only if it is difficult: effects of sleep on problem solving.

Authors:  Ut Na Sio; Padraic Monaghan; Tom Ormerod
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-02

Review 3.  Striatal contributions to declarative memory retrieval.

Authors:  Jason M Scimeca; David Badre
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 4.  Parameterizing developmental changes in epistemic trust.

Authors:  Baxter S Eaves; Patrick Shafto
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

5.  Modeling early lexico-semantic network development: Perceptual features matter most.

Authors:  Ryan Peters; Arielle Borovsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2019-04

6.  Complex network structure influences processing in long-term and short-term memory.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Kit Ying Chan; Steven Roodenrys
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  The dynamics of memory retrieval in hierarchical networks.

Authors:  Yifan Gu; Pulin Gong
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 1.621

Review 8.  Contributions of modern network science to the cognitive sciences: revisiting research spirals of representation and process.

Authors:  Nichol Castro; Cynthia S Q Siew
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 2.704

9.  Modeling Semantic Fluency Data as Search on a Semantic Network.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Zemla; Joseph L Austerweil
Journal:  Cogsci       Date:  2017-07

10.  The influence of the phonological neighborhood clustering coefficient on spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Kit Ying Chan; Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.