Literature DB >> 18030456

Error generalization as a function of velocity and duration: human reaching movements.

Joseph T Francis1.   

Abstract

Our sensory-motor control system has a remarkable ability to adapt to novel dynamics during reaching movements and generalizes this adaptation to movements made in different directions, positions and even speeds. The degree and pattern of this generalization are of great importance in deducing the underlying mechanisms that govern our motor control. In this report we expand our knowledge on the generalization between movements made at different speeds. We wished to determine the pattern of generalization between different speed and duration movements on a trial-by-trial basis. In addition, we tested three hypotheses for the pattern of generalization. The first hypothesis was that the generalization was maximum for the speed of the movement just made with a linear decrease in generalization as one moves away from that preferred speed. The second was that the generalization is always highest for the fastest speed movements and linearly decreases with speed. The last hypothesis came from our preliminary results, which suggested that the generalization plateaus. Human subjects made targeted reaching movements at four different maximum speeds (15, 35, 55 and 75 cm/s) presented in pseudorandom order to one spatial target (15 cm extent) while holding onto a robotic manipulandum that produced a viscous curl field. Catch trials (trial where the curl field was unexpectedly removed) were used to probe the generalization between the four speed/durations on a movement-by-movement basis. We found that the pattern of generalization was linear between the first three speed categories (15-55 cm/s), but plateaued after the 55 cm/s category. We compared the subjects' results with a simulated adaptive controller that used a population code by combining the output of basis elements. These basis elements encoded limb velocity and associated this with a force expectation at that velocity. We found that using a basis set of Gaussians the adaptive controller produced movements that generalized in virtually the exact manner as the subjects, as we have previously demonstrated for movements made to different spatial targets. Thus, the human internal model may employ such a population code.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18030456     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1202-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  28 in total

1.  Role of cocontraction in arm movement accuracy.

Authors:  Paul L Gribble; Lucy I Mullin; Nicholas Cothros; Andrew Mattar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01-22       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Adaptation to stable and unstable dynamics achieved by combined impedance control and inverse dynamics model.

Authors:  David W Franklin; Rieko Osu; Etienne Burdet; Mitsuo Kawato; Theodore E Milner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The effect of rest breaks on human sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Otmar Bock; Monika Thomas; Valentina Grigorova
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Influence of the inter-reach-interval on motor learning.

Authors:  Joseph T Francis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-10-29       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Temporal and amplitude generalization in motor learning.

Authors:  S J Goodbody; D M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Primate motor cortex and free arm movements to visual targets in three-dimensional space. II. Coding of the direction of movement by a neuronal population.

Authors:  A P Georgopoulos; R E Kettner; A B Schwartz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Relation of pyramidal tract activity to force exerted during voluntary movement.

Authors:  E V Evarts
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Neuronal specification of direction and distance during reaching movements in the superior precentral premotor area and primary motor cortex of monkeys.

Authors:  Q G Fu; J I Suarez; T J Ebner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  On the relations between the direction of two-dimensional arm movements and cell discharge in primate motor cortex.

Authors:  A P Georgopoulos; J F Kalaska; R Caminiti; J T Massey
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  5 in total

1.  Linear hypergeneralization of learned dynamics across movement speeds reveals anisotropic, gain-encoding primitives for motor adaptation.

Authors:  Wilsaan M Joiner; Obafunso Ajayi; Gary C Sing; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Gait speed influences aftereffect size following locomotor adaptation, but only in certain environments.

Authors:  Rami J Hamzey; Eileen M Kirk; Erin V L Vasudevan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Using dual tasks to test immediate transfer of training between naturalistic movements: a proof-of-principle study.

Authors:  Sydney Y Schaefer; Catherine E Lang
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  An adaptive spinal-like controller: tunable biomimetic behavior for a robotic limb.

Authors:  Filip Stefanovic; Henrietta L Galiana
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.819

5.  Generalization and multirate models of motor adaptation.

Authors:  Hirokazu Tanaka; John W Krakauer; Terrence J Sejnowski
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.026

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.