Literature DB >> 18029503

Nutrient and methyl mercury exposure from consuming fish.

Gary J Myers1, Philip W Davidson, J J Strain.   

Abstract

There is controversy about the risks and benefits of consuming fish. Fish consumption provides nutrients, some of which are essential for brain growth and development. All fish, however, contain methyl mercury (MeHg), a known neurotoxicant. The toxic effect of MeHg seems most damaging during brain development, and thus, prenatal exposure is of greatest concern. At present the level of prenatal exposure associated with risk to a child's neurodevelopment is not known. Balancing the rewards and possible risks of fish consumption presents a dilemma to consumers and regulatory authorities. We review the nutrients in fish that are important in brain development and the current evidence of risk from MeHg at exposure levels achieved by consuming fish. We then review the findings from a large prospective cohort study of a population that consumes fish daily, the Seychelles Child Development Study. The MeHg content of the fish consumed in the Seychelles is similar to that of ocean fish available in industrialized countries, so they represent a sentinel population for any risk from fish consumption. In the Seychelles, evaluations of the children through 9 y of age show no consistent pattern of adverse associations with prenatal MeHg exposure. Recent studies in the Seychelles have focused on nutrients in fish that might influence a child's development, including long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, iodine, iron, and choline. Preliminary findings from this study suggest that the beneficial influence of nutrients from fish may counter any adverse effects of MeHg on the developing nervous system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18029503     DOI: 10.1093/jn/137.12.2805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  29 in total

Review 1.  Balancing the benefits of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and the risks of methylmercury exposure from fish consumption.

Authors:  Kathryn R Mahaffey; Elsie M Sunderland; Hing Man Chan; Anna L Choi; Philippe Grandjean; Koenraad Mariën; Emily Oken; Mineshi Sakamoto; Rita Schoeny; Pál Weihe; Chong-Huai Yan; Akira Yasutake
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 7.110

2.  Benefit-risk assessment of commonly consumed fish species from South China Sea based on methyl mercury and DHA.

Authors:  Ping Wang; Shao-Wei Chen; Zi-Hui Chen; Wei-Lun Huo; Rui Huang; Wei-Xiong Huang; Jie-Wen Peng; Xing-Fen Yang
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  Risk-Benefit Modeling to Guide Health Research in Collaboration with Great Lakes Fish Consuming Native American Communities.

Authors:  Matthew J Dellinger; Ronald Anguzu; Noel Pingatore; Michael Ripley
Journal:  J Great Lakes Res       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 2.480

4.  Structure-activity relationship of flavonoids derived from medicinal plants in preventing methylmercury-induced mitochondrial dysfunction.

Authors:  Jeferson L Franco; Thais Posser; Fabiana Missau; Moacir G Pizzolatti; Adair R S Dos Santos; Diogo O Souza; Michael Aschner; João B T Rocha; Alcir L Dafre; Marcelo Farina
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 4.860

5.  Eating fish for two.

Authors:  Jj Strain
Journal:  Nutr Bull       Date:  2014-06

6.  Effects of Short-Term Docosahexaenoic Acid Supplementation on Markers of Inflammation after Eccentric Strength Exercise in Women.

Authors:  Katherine E Corder; Katherine R Newsham; Jennifer L McDaniel; Uthayashanker R Ezekiel; Edward P Weiss
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 7.  Neurophysiologic measures of auditory function in fish consumers: associations with long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids and methylmercury.

Authors:  Adam C Dziorny; Mark S Orlando; J J Strain; Philip W Davidson; Gary J Myers
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 4.294

8.  Methylmercury disruption of embryonic neural development in Drosophila.

Authors:  Matthew D Rand; Julie C Dao; Todd A Clason
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 4.294

Review 9.  Negative confounding in the evaluation of toxicity: the case of methylmercury in fish and seafood.

Authors:  Anna L Choi; Sylvaine Cordier; Pál Weihe; Philippe Grandjean
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.635

10.  Longitudinal mercury monitoring within the Japanese and Korean communities (United States): implications for exposure determination and public health protection.

Authors:  Ami Tsuchiya; Thomas A Hinners; Finn Krogstad; Jim W White; Thomas M Burbacher; Elaine M Faustman; Koenraad Mariën
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.