Literature DB >> 18027250

The potential of the human embryo.

Mark T Brown1.   

Abstract

A higher order potential analysis of moral status clarifies the issues that divide Human Being Theorists who oppose embryo research from Person Theorists who favor embryo research. Higher order potential personhood is transitive if it is active, identity preserving and morally relevant. If the transition from the Second Order Potential of the embryo to the First Order Potential of an infant is transitive, opponents of embryo research make a powerful case for the moral status of the embryo. If it is intransitive, then the Person Theorist can draw lines between levels of moral status that permit embryo research to proceed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18027250     DOI: 10.1080/03605310701680973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Philos        ISSN: 0360-5310


  7 in total

1.  Strange Bedfellows? Common Ground on the Moral Status Question.

Authors:  Shane Maxwell Wilkins
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2016-02-17

2.  Twin Inc.

Authors:  Rose Hershenov; Derek Doroski
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2018-08

3.  Dignity, Health, and Membership: Who Counts as One of Us?

Authors:  Bryan C Pilkington
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2016-02-11

4.  The Constitution of the Human Embryo as Substantial Change.

Authors:  David Alvargonzález
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2016-02-04

5.  A framework for the responsible reform of the 14-day rule in human embryo research.

Authors:  Yaojin Peng; Jianwei Lv; Zhenyu Xiao; Lulu Ding; Qi Zhou
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 15.328

6.  Phenomenology of pregnancy and the ethics of abortion.

Authors:  Fredrik Svenaeus
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2018-03

Review 7.  How and Why to Replace the 14-Day Rule.

Authors:  Sarah Chan
Journal:  Curr Stem Cell Rep       Date:  2018-07-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.