Literature DB >> 18025853

Cost-effectiveness of percent free PSA for prostate cancer detection in men with a total PSA of 4-10 ng/ml.

Clara Bermúdez-Tamayo1, Jose Jesús Martín Martín, Maria del Puerto López del Amo González, Carmen Pérez Romero.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of two diagnostic strategies for prostate cancer in men with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels of 4-10 ng/ml and normal digital rectal examination (DRE).
DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using a decision tree model. Data collection and a systematic review of patients at the Urology Department (Carlos Haya Hospital) were made. 101 patients over the age of 40 with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/ml and normal DRE were selected. Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) and percent free PSA testing prior to TRUS-Bx were performed. The outcome measures used were the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, and costs were calculated through activity-based costing. The effectiveness was measured by means of the number of detected cases, test utility and actual cases (detected cases minus lost cases).
RESULTS: Using base-case analysis, the strategy of percent free PSA + TRUS-Bx was found to be the most cost-effective. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for free PSA + TRUS-Bx compared with TRUS-Bx was EUR 2,277.40. Strategy 2 (TRUS-Bx) would be more cost-effective if the cost of percent free PSA increased to EUR 21.64 or if prostate cancer prevalence increased to 26%.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of percent free PSA prior to TRUS-Bx is the most cost-effective diagnostic strategy. However, this result is very sensitive and strategy 2 (TRUS-Bx) would be more cost-effective if the cost of the percent free PSA increased to EUR 21.64 or if the prevalence of prostate cancer increased to above 26%. (c) 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18025853     DOI: 10.1159/000109720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  4 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of prostate cancer screening: a simulation study based on ERSPC data.

Authors:  E A M Heijnsdijk; T M de Carvalho; A Auvinen; M Zappa; V Nelen; M Kwiatkowski; A Villers; A Páez; S M Moss; T L J Tammela; F Recker; L Denis; S V Carlsson; E M Wever; C H Bangma; F H Schröder; M J Roobol; J Hugosson; H J de Koning
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)-Based Population Screening for Prostate Cancer: An Economic Analysis.

Authors:  A Tawfik
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2015-05-01

3.  Assessment of harms, benefits, and cost-effectiveness of prostate cancer screening: A micro-simulation study of 230 scenarios.

Authors:  Abraham M Getaneh; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Monique J Roobol; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 4.  Health Economic Evidence for Liquid- and Tissue-based Molecular Tests that Inform Decisions on Prostate Biopsies and Treatment of Localised Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Koen Degeling; Amanda Pereira-Salgado; Niall M Corcoran; Paul C Boutros; Peter Kuhn; Maarten J IJzerman
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2021-03-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.