Literature DB >> 18025006

Estimating node degree in bait-prey graphs.

Denise Scholtens1, Tony Chiang, Wolfgang Huber, Robert Gentleman.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Proteins work together to drive biological processes in cellular machines. Summarizing global and local properties of the set of protein interactions, the interactome, is necessary for describing cellular systems. We consider a relatively simple per-protein feature of the interactome: the number of interaction partners for a protein, which in graph terminology is the degree of the protein.
RESULTS: Using data subject to both stochastic and systematic sources of false positive and false negative observations, we develop an explicit probability model and resultant likelihood method to estimate node degree on portions of the interactome assayed by bait-prey technologies. This approach yields substantial improvement in degree estimation over the current practice that naively sums observed edges. Accurate modeling of observed data in relation to true but unknown parameters of interest gives a formal point of reference from which to draw conclusions about the system under study. AVAILABILITY: All analyses discussed in this text can be performed using the ppiStats and ppiData packages available through the Bioconductor project (http://www.bioconductor.org).

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18025006     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  8 in total

1.  A general pipeline for quality and statistical assessment of protein interaction data using R and Bioconductor.

Authors:  Tony Chiang; Denise Scholtens
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 2.  Protein interaction predictions from diverse sources.

Authors:  Yin Liu; Inyoung Kim; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 7.851

3.  Connectedness of PPI network neighborhoods identifies regulatory hub proteins.

Authors:  Andrew D Fox; Benjamin J Hescott; Anselm C Blumer; Donna K Slonim
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  From evidence to inference: probing the evolution of protein interaction networks.

Authors:  Oliver Ratmann; Carsten Wiuf; John W Pinney
Journal:  HFSP J       Date:  2009-10-19

5.  High throughput interaction data reveals degree conservation of hub proteins.

Authors:  A Fox; D Taylor; D K Slonim
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2009

6.  Triangle network motifs predict complexes by complementing high-error interactomes with structural information.

Authors:  Bill Andreopoulos; Christof Winter; Dirk Labudde; Michael Schroeder
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Prioritizing functional modules mediating genetic perturbations and their phenotypic effects: a global strategy.

Authors:  Li Wang; Fengzhu Sun; Ting Chen
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 13.583

8.  Precision and recall estimates for two-hybrid screens.

Authors:  Hailiang Huang; Joel S Bader
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 6.937

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.