Literature DB >> 19209717

High throughput interaction data reveals degree conservation of hub proteins.

A Fox1, D Taylor, D K Slonim.   

Abstract

Research in model organisms relies on unspoken assumptions about the conservation of protein-protein interactions across species, yet several analyses suggest such conservation is limited. Fortunately, for many purposes the crucial issue is not global conservation of interactions, but preferential conservation of functionally important ones. An observed bias towards essentiality in highly-connected proteins implies the functional importance of such "hubs". We therefore define the notion of degree-conservation and demonstrate that hubs are preferentially degree-conserved. We show that a protein is more likely to be a hub if it has a high-degree ortholog, and that once a protein becomes a hub, it tends to remain so. We also identify a positive correlation between the average degree of a protein and the conservation of its interaction partners, and we find that the conservation of individual hub interactions is surprisingly high. Our work has important implications for prediction of protein function, computational inference of PPIs, and interpretation of data from model organisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19209717      PMCID: PMC2795391          DOI: 10.1142/9789812836939_0037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput        ISSN: 2335-6928


  23 in total

1.  Identification of potential interaction networks using sequence-based searches for conserved protein-protein interactions or "interologs".

Authors:  L R Matthews; P Vaglio; J Reboul; H Ge; B P Davis; J Garrels; S Vincent; M Vidal
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Lethality and centrality in protein networks.

Authors:  H Jeong; S P Mason; A L Barabási; Z N Oltvai
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-05-03       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Discovery of regulatory elements by a computational method for phylogenetic footprinting.

Authors:  Mathieu Blanchette; Martin Tompa
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  IntAct: an open source molecular interaction database.

Authors:  Henning Hermjakob; Luisa Montecchi-Palazzi; Chris Lewington; Sugath Mudali; Samuel Kerrien; Sandra Orchard; Martin Vingron; Bernd Roechert; Peter Roepstorff; Alfonso Valencia; Hanah Margalit; John Armstrong; Amos Bairoch; Gianni Cesareni; David Sherman; Rolf Apweiler
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 5.  MINT: a Molecular INTeraction database.

Authors:  Andreas Zanzoni; Luisa Montecchi-Palazzi; Michele Quondam; Gabriele Ausiello; Manuela Helmer-Citterich; Gianni Cesareni
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2002-02-20       Impact factor: 4.124

6.  Automatic clustering of orthologs and in-paralogs from pairwise species comparisons.

Authors:  M Remm; C E Storm; E L Sonnhammer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-12-14       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Evolutionary rate in the protein interaction network.

Authors:  Hunter B Fraser; Aaron E Hirsh; Lars M Steinmetz; Curt Scharfe; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-04-26       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Identifying biological themes within lists of genes with EASE.

Authors:  Douglas A Hosack; Glynn Dennis; Brad T Sherman; H Clifford Lane; Richard A Lempicki
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  Analyzing yeast protein-protein interaction data obtained from different sources.

Authors:  Gary D Bader; Christopher W V Hogue
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  No simple dependence between protein evolution rate and the number of protein-protein interactions: only the most prolific interactors tend to evolve slowly.

Authors:  I King Jordan; Yuri I Wolf; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2003-01-06       Impact factor: 3.260

View more
  7 in total

1.  Connectedness of PPI network neighborhoods identifies regulatory hub proteins.

Authors:  Andrew D Fox; Benjamin J Hescott; Anselm C Blumer; Donna K Slonim
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Biological interaction networks are conserved at the module level.

Authors:  Guy E Zinman; Shan Zhong; Ziv Bar-Joseph
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2011-08-23

3.  Molecular dysexpression in gastric cancer revealed by integrated analysis of transcriptome data.

Authors:  Xiaomei Li; Weiwei Dong; Xueling Qu; Huixia Zhao; Shuo Wang; Yixin Hao; Qiuwen Li; Jianhua Zhu; Min Ye; Wenhua Xiao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Topsy-Turvy: integrating a global view into sequence-based PPI prediction.

Authors:  Rohit Singh; Kapil Devkota; Samuel Sledzieski; Bonnie Berger; Lenore Cowen
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 6.931

5.  What evidence is there for the homology of protein-protein interactions?

Authors:  Anna C F Lewis; Nick S Jones; Mason A Porter; Charlotte M Deane
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  FEZ2 has acquired additional protein interaction partners relative to FEZ1: functional and evolutionary implications.

Authors:  Marcos R Alborghetti; Ariane S Furlan; Jörg Kobarg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Deciphering peculiar protein-protein interacting modules in Deinococcus radiodurans.

Authors:  Karim Mezhoud; Haïtham Sghaier; Insaf Barkallah
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 4.540

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.