Literature DB >> 18024116

Systematic review of studies of patients' satisfaction with breast reconstruction after mastectomy.

Veronique Guyomard1, Sam Leinster, Mark Wilkinson.   

Abstract

Systematic review of studies of patients' satisfaction with breast reconstruction published in English (1994-2006) using Medline, Embase, Cochrane databases. Twenty-eight studies related to cosmesis and two related to pain management were identified. Study designs were mostly randomised surveys but half of samples were small. Five studies compared surgical techniques and satisfaction, twelve analysed surgical techniques; two studies looked at the effect of radiation therapy. Nine studies assessed satisfaction determinants. All studies reported good levels of satisfaction. Methodological deficiencies (small sample sizes, context and study designs, satisfaction assessment, basic statistical analysis) limit the generalisability of the findings. Overall, studies suggested that patients were satisfied with breast reconstruction whatever the technique used, whereas age or procedure timing did not affect general satisfaction. Breast symmetry, size, shape and scars were reported as influencing the patients' score. Nipple reconstruction positively influenced satisfaction; radiation before/after reconstruction achieved satisfactory cosmesis, and complications predicted dissatisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18024116     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2007.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  21 in total

1.  Different procedures should be on offer.

Authors:  Jochen-Frederick Hernekamp; Thomas Kremer; Ulrich Kneser; Jörg Heil; Christof Sohn
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Nipple-areolar complex reconstruction and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ellen S Satteson; Benjamin J Brown; Maurice Y Nahabedian
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-02

3.  Sacramento area breast cancer epidemiology study: use of postmastectomy breast reconstruction along the rural-to-urban continuum.

Authors:  Warren H Tseng; Thomas R Stevenson; Robert J Canter; Steven L Chen; Vijay P Khatri; Richard J Bold; Steve R Martinez
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 4.  Breast reconstruction following prophylactic or therapeutic mastectomy for breast cancer: Recommendations from an evidence-based provincial guideline.

Authors:  Melissa Shea-Budgell; May Lynn Quan; Blair Mehling; Claire Temple-Oberle
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.947

5.  Oncological Safety, Surgical Outcome, and Patient Satisfaction of Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery With Contralateral Balancing Reduction Mammoplasty.

Authors:  Hannah St Denis-Katz; Bahareh B Ghaedi; Aisling Fitzpatrick; Jing Zhang
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 0.947

6.  A novel pilot study using spatial frequency domain imaging to assess oxygenation of perforator flaps during reconstructive breast surgery.

Authors:  John T Nguyen; Samuel J Lin; Adam M Tobias; Sylvain Gioux; Amaan Mazhar; David J Cuccia; Yoshitomo Ashitate; Alan Stockdale; Rafiou Oketokoun; Nicholas J Durr; Lorissa A Moffitt; Anthony J Durkin; Bruce J Tromberg; John V Frangioni; Bernard T Lee
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.539

Review 7.  Immediate versus delayed reconstruction following surgery for breast cancer.

Authors:  Nigel D'Souza; Geraldine Darmanin; Zbys Fedorowicz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-07-06

8.  A Complication Analysis of 2 Acellular Dermal Matrices in Prosthetic-based Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Orion P Keifer; Eugenia K Page; Alexandra Hart; Randall Rudderman; Grant W Carlson; Albert Losken
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-07-13

9.  Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis on the clinical outcomes and cost of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap versus implants for breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Ankur Khajuria; Oliver J Smith; Maxim Prokopenko; Maximillian Greenfield; Afshin Mosahebi
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-22

Review 10.  Two-Stage Tissue-Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Focus on the Surgical Technique.

Authors:  Elisa Bellini; Marianna Pesce; PierLuigi Santi; Edoardo Raposio
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-12-10       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.