Literature DB >> 18023984

Dynamic interplays between memory systems depend on practice: the hippocampus is not always the first to provide solution.

G Martel1, J Blanchard, N Mons, F Gastambide, J Micheau, J-L Guillou.   

Abstract

Previous studies showed that the optimization of behavioral performance through extended training depends on a switch from hippocampus-based memory to striatum-based habit. Here we investigate whether the amount of training within one learning session influences the retention of memory for hippocampal versus striatal strategies. Mice were trained to search for a submerged cue-marked platform which remained in the same spatial location in the water-maze for each of three training regimens (4, 12 or 22 trials). Subsequently, they were either tested for retention of memory 1 h or 24 h later on a probe test or killed at different time points over a 7-h period to determine the kinetic of cAMP response element binding protein (CREB) phosphorylation in both memory systems. During the probe test mice had to choose between a submerged platform located in the same position as during the acquisition phase (spatial solution) and a platform marked by the cue but located in the opposite quadrant of the pool (cue-guided solution). Results showed that the animals first preferred the cue-marked platform, which represents a strategy that was selectively impaired by lesions of the dorsolateral caudate-putamen. With further practice, or context pre-exposure, animals transiently favored the hippocampus-dependent place solution but finally, both strategies became interchangeable and insensitive to either lesion. CREB phosphorylation increased in both memory systems following acquisition but training-dependent changes selectively occurred in the hippocampus wherein biphasic activation was initiated by the four-trial training and blocked by training for 22 trials. These findings indicate that learning in one session consists of three acquisition stages with parallel engagement of multiple memory systems at the beginning of learning. They suggest, however, that, in a later phase, dynamic interplays promote the use of the most adapted brain system depending on practice and this is accompanied by specific patterns of CREB phosphorylation in the hippocampus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18023984     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  10 in total

1.  Pre-exposure to context affects learning strategy selection in mice.

Authors:  Tumay Tunur; Gary P Dohanich; Laura A Schrader
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Hippocampal SSTR4 somatostatin receptors control the selection of memory strategies.

Authors:  François Gastambide; Cécile Viollet; Gabriel Lepousez; Jacques Epelbaum; Jean-Louis Guillou
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  A double dissociation revealing bidirectional competition between striatum and hippocampus during learning.

Authors:  Anni S Lee; Ronald S Duman; Christopher Pittenger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Ca-stimulated type 8 adenylyl cyclase is required for rapid acquisition of novel spatial information and for working/episodic-like memory.

Authors:  Ming Zhang; Changjong Moon; Guy C-K Chan; Lan Yang; Fei Zheng; Alana C Conti; Lisa Muglia; Louis J Muglia; Daniel R Storm; Hongbing Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Differential Arc expression in the hippocampus and striatum during the transition from attentive to automatic navigation on a plus maze.

Authors:  Robert S Gardner; Daniel F Suarez; Nadira K Robinson-Burton; Christopher J Rudnicky; Asish Gulati; Giorgio A Ascoli; Theodore C Dumas
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 6.  Deceivingly dynamic: Learning-dependent changes in stathmin and microtubules.

Authors:  Shusaku Uchida; Gleb P Shumyatsky
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 2.877

7.  Dietary Polyphenol Supplementation Prevents Alterations of Spatial Navigation in Middle-Aged Mice.

Authors:  Julien Bensalem; Laure Servant; Serge Alfos; David Gaudout; Sophie Layé; Véronique Pallet; Pauline Lafenetre
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Morphine Reward Promotes Cue-Sensitive Learning: Implication of Dorsal Striatal CREB Activity.

Authors:  Mathieu Baudonnat; Jean-Louis Guillou; Marianne Husson; Veronique D Bohbot; Lars Schwabe; Vincent David
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 4.157

9.  Integrating cortico-limbic-basal ganglia architectures for learning model-based and model-free navigation strategies.

Authors:  Mehdi Khamassi; Mark D Humphries
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Variable training but not sleep improves consolidation of motor adaptation.

Authors:  Benjamin Thürer; Frederik D Weber; Jan Born; Thorsten Stein
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.