RATIONALE: Somatostatin (SS14) has been implicated in various cognitive disorders, and converging evidence from animal studies suggests that SS14 neurons differentially regulate hippocampal- and striatal-dependent memory formation. Four SS14 receptor subtypes (SSTR1-4) are expressed in the hippocampus, but their respective roles in memory processes remain to be determined. OBJECTIVES: In the present study, effects of selective SSTR1-4 agonists on memory formation were assessed in a water-maze task which can engage either hippocampus-dependent "place" and/or striatum-dependent "cue" memory formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mice received an intrahippocampal injection of one of each of the selective agonists and were then trained to locate an escape platform based on either distal cues (place memory) or a visible proximal cue (cue memory). Retention was tested 24 h later on probe trials aimed at identifying which memory strategy was preferentially retained. RESULTS: Both SS14 and the SSTR4 agonist (L-803,087) dramatically impaired place memory formation in a dose-dependent manner, whereas SSTR1 (L-797,591), SSTR2 (L-779,976), or SSTR3 (L-796,778) agonists did not yield any behavioral effects. However, unlike SS14, the SSTR4 agonist also dose-dependently enhanced cue-based memory formation. This effect was confirmed in another striatal-dependent memory task, the bar-pressing task, where L-803,087 improved memory of the instrumental response, whereas SS14 was once again ineffective. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that hippocampal SSTR4 are selectively involved in the selection of memory strategies by switching from the use of hippocampus-based multiple associations to the use of simple dorsal striatum-based behavioral responses. Possible neural mechanisms and functional implications are discussed.
RATIONALE: Somatostatin (SS14) has been implicated in various cognitive disorders, and converging evidence from animal studies suggests that SS14 neurons differentially regulate hippocampal- and striatal-dependent memory formation. Four SS14 receptor subtypes (SSTR1-4) are expressed in the hippocampus, but their respective roles in memory processes remain to be determined. OBJECTIVES: In the present study, effects of selective SSTR1-4 agonists on memory formation were assessed in a water-maze task which can engage either hippocampus-dependent "place" and/or striatum-dependent "cue" memory formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Mice received an intrahippocampal injection of one of each of the selective agonists and were then trained to locate an escape platform based on either distal cues (place memory) or a visible proximal cue (cue memory). Retention was tested 24 h later on probe trials aimed at identifying which memory strategy was preferentially retained. RESULTS: Both SS14 and the SSTR4 agonist (L-803,087) dramatically impaired place memory formation in a dose-dependent manner, whereas SSTR1 (L-797,591), SSTR2 (L-779,976), or SSTR3 (L-796,778) agonists did not yield any behavioral effects. However, unlike SS14, the SSTR4 agonist also dose-dependently enhanced cue-based memory formation. This effect was confirmed in another striatal-dependent memory task, the bar-pressing task, where L-803,087 improved memory of the instrumental response, whereas SS14 was once again ineffective. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that hippocampal SSTR4 are selectively involved in the selection of memory strategies by switching from the use of hippocampus-based multiple associations to the use of simple dorsal striatum-based behavioral responses. Possible neural mechanisms and functional implications are discussed.
Authors: Karin E Sandoval; Susan A Farr; William A Banks; Michael L Niehoff; John E Morley; Albert M Crider; Ken A Witt Journal: Eur J Pharmacol Date: 2010-12-24 Impact factor: 4.432
Authors: Stefan D Schlussman; Jared Cassin; Orna Levran; Yong Zhang; Ann Ho; Mary Jeanne Kreek Journal: Brain Res Date: 2010-05-15 Impact factor: 3.252
Authors: A Stengel; M Goebel-Stengel; L Wang; A Luckey; E Hu; J Rivier; Y Taché Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2011-05-13 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: Thomas D Prévôt; François Gastambide; Cécile Viollet; Nadia Henkous; Guillaume Martel; Jacques Epelbaum; Daniel Béracochéa; Jean-Louis Guillou Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2016-12-16 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: William L Neumann; Karin E Sandoval; Shirin Mobayen; Mahsa Minaeian; Stephen G Kukielski; Khush N Srabony; Rafael Frare; Olivia Slater; Susan A Farr; Michael L Niehoff; Audrey Hospital; Maria Kontoyianni; A Michael Crider; Ken A Witt Journal: RSC Med Chem Date: 2021-05-26