Literature DB >> 18023535

Focused analgesia in waking and hypnosis: effects on pain, memory, and somatosensory event-related potentials.

Vilfredo De Pascalis1, Immacolata Cacace, Francesca Massicolle.   

Abstract

Somatosensory event-related potentials (SERPs) to painful electric standard stimuli under an odd-ball paradigm were analyzed in 12 high hypnotizable (HH), 12 medium hypnotizable (MH), and 12 low hypnotizable (LH) subjects during waking, hypnosis, and a cued eyes-open posthypnotic condition. In each of these conditions subjects were suggested to produce an obstructive imagery of stimulus perception as a treatment for pain reduction. A No-Analgesia treatment served as a control in waking and hypnosis conditions. The subjects were required to count the number of delivered target stimuli. HH subjects experienced significant pain and distress reductions during posthypnotic analgesia as compared to hypnotic analgesia and between these two analgesic conditions as compared to the two control conditions. Outside of hypnosis, these subjects remembered less pain and distress levels than they reported during hypnotic and posthypnotic analgesia treatments. In contrast, for waking-analgesia treatment, HH subjects remembered similar pain and distress levels to those they reported concurrently with the stimulation. HH subjects, during hypnotic and posthypnotic analgesia treatments, detected a smaller number of target stimuli and displayed a significant amplitude reduction of the midline frontal and central N140 and P200 SERP components. No significant SERP differences were observed for these subjects between treatments in waking condition and between hypnotic and posthypnotic analgesic treatments. For the MH and LH subjects no significant N140 and P200 amplitude changes were observed among analgesic conditions as compared to control conditions. These amplitude findings are seen as indicating that hypnotic analgesia can affect earlier and later stages of stimulus processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18023535     DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  17 in total

Review 1.  [Negative and positive suggestions in anaesthesia : Improved communication with anxious surgical patients].

Authors:  E Hansen; C Bejenke
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  High Hypnotizability Impairs the Cerebellar Control of Pain.

Authors:  Tommaso Bocci; Davide Barloscio; Laura Parenti; Ferdinando Sartucci; Giancarlo Carli; Enrica L Santarcangelo
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Baroreceptor activation attenuates attentional effects on pain-evoked potentials.

Authors:  Marcus A Gray; Ludovico Minati; Giulia Paoletti; Hugo D Critchley
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  Orienting attention modulates pain perception: an ERP study.

Authors:  Sam C C Chan; Chetwyn C H Chan; Anne S K Kwan; Kin-hung Ting; Tak-yi Chui
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Structural and functional cerebral correlates of hypnotic suggestibility.

Authors:  Alexa Huber; Fausta Lui; Davide Duzzi; Giuseppe Pagnoni; Carlo Adolfo Porro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Elucidating unconscious processing with instrumental hypnosis.

Authors:  Mathieu Landry; Krystèle Appourchaux; Amir Raz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-28

7.  Hypnotizability and Placebo Analgesia in Waking and Hypnosis as Modulators of Auditory Startle Responses in Healthy Women: An ERP Study.

Authors:  Vilfredo De Pascalis; Paolo Scacchia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Pain modulation in waking and hypnosis in women: event-related potentials and sources of cortical activity.

Authors:  Vilfredo De Pascalis; Vincenzo Varriale; Immacolata Cacace
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Cognitive modulation of psychophysical, respiratory and autonomic responses to cold pressor test.

Authors:  Enrica L Santarcangelo; Giulia Paoletti; Iacopo Chiavacci; Carlo Palombo; Giancarlo Carli; Maurizio Varanini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Hypnotizability, hypnosis and prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex in healthy women: an ERP analysis.

Authors:  Vilfredo De Pascalis; Emanuela Russo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.