OBJECTIVES: To outline the principles underlying changes overtime in entitlement to sickness absence benefit in Denmark. METHODS: The Danish sickness benefit scheme during the past 30 years has been studied based on a comprehensive review of the Sickness Benefit Act from 1973, and all later amendments to the act. RESULTS: Entitlement to sickness benefit in Denmark has undergone considerable changes during the past 30 years. The guiding principles of the reforms have been financial savings in combination with an assumption that human behaviour can be controlled through bureaucratic administration with focus on monitoring and evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: The Sickness Benefit Act was initially based on a broad concept of disease but the implementation underwent major changes. In the 1970s and 1980s entitlement to benefit depended very much on medical diagnosis. This practice changed and today's policy is to some extent a return to the biopsychosocial approach in the sense that the citizen is not regarded a passive victim of disease but an active player in influencing own working capacity. Added to this is, however, a new element of much tighter control leaving less room for autonomy.
OBJECTIVES: To outline the principles underlying changes overtime in entitlement to sickness absence benefit in Denmark. METHODS: The Danish sickness benefit scheme during the past 30 years has been studied based on a comprehensive review of the Sickness Benefit Act from 1973, and all later amendments to the act. RESULTS: Entitlement to sickness benefit in Denmark has undergone considerable changes during the past 30 years. The guiding principles of the reforms have been financial savings in combination with an assumption that human behaviour can be controlled through bureaucratic administration with focus on monitoring and evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: The Sickness Benefit Act was initially based on a broad concept of disease but the implementation underwent major changes. In the 1970s and 1980s entitlement to benefit depended very much on medical diagnosis. This practice changed and today's policy is to some extent a return to the biopsychosocial approach in the sense that the citizen is not regarded a passive victim of disease but an active player in influencing own working capacity. Added to this is, however, a new element of much tighter control leaving less room for autonomy.
Authors: Thomas Clausen; Jesper Kristiansen; Jørgen Vinsløv Hansen; Jan Hyld Pejtersen; Hermann Burr Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2012-08-15 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Christina Malmose Stapelfeldt; Chris Jensen; Niels Trolle Andersen; Nils Fleten; Claus Vinther Nielsen Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-08-15 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Christina Malmose Stapelfeldt; Claus Vinther Nielsen; Niels Trolle Andersen; Line Krane; Nils Fleten; Vilhelm Borg; Chris Jensen Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-06-13 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Harald Hannerz; Betina Holbæk Pedersen; Otto M Poulsen; Frank Humle; Lars L Andersen Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-10-19 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Carina A Thorstensson; Jenny Mathiasson; Barbro Arvidsson; Anders Heide; Ingemar F Petersson Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2008-11-07 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Christina M Stapelfeldt; Merete Labriola; Anders Bonde Jensen; Niels Trolle Andersen; Anne-Mette H Momsen; Claus Vinther Nielsen Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-07-29 Impact factor: 3.295