BACKGROUND AND PURPOSES: To develop a dose-volume-based Plan Quality Index for IMRT plans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study used a H(ealthy) Tissue Conformity Index to describe the overall plan conformity, a M(erit) function to describe the target coverage and a P(enalty) function to evaluate doses to critical organs. The Euclidean distance (PQI) between (H, M, P) and (1,1,1) represented the quality of a treatment plan. By checking the polarity of each term in M and P, one might conclude if the plan was satisfied with the given treatment protocol. Ten prostate plans (3-DCRT and IMRT) and 20 NPC IMRT plans were used to test PQI, Conformation Number (CN), COnformal INdex (COIN). EUD was used as a vehicle to explain the results. This study defined the power of a quality index as the ratio of the absolute difference to the mean of the same index of two plans, to compare the discerning power of PQI, CN and COIN. RESULTS: The plan quality discerning power of PQI, COIN and CN was 20.6%, 8.2% and 5.5%, respectively, in prostate plans. CONCLUSION: PQI improved the plan quality discerning power and was capable of discerning qualified and unqualified treatment plans.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSES: To develop a dose-volume-based Plan Quality Index for IMRT plans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study used a H(ealthy) Tissue Conformity Index to describe the overall plan conformity, a M(erit) function to describe the target coverage and a P(enalty) function to evaluate doses to critical organs. The Euclidean distance (PQI) between (H, M, P) and (1,1,1) represented the quality of a treatment plan. By checking the polarity of each term in M and P, one might conclude if the plan was satisfied with the given treatment protocol. Ten prostate plans (3-DCRT and IMRT) and 20 NPC IMRT plans were used to test PQI, Conformation Number (CN), COnformal INdex (COIN). EUD was used as a vehicle to explain the results. This study defined the power of a quality index as the ratio of the absolute difference to the mean of the same index of two plans, to compare the discerning power of PQI, CN and COIN. RESULTS: The plan quality discerning power of PQI, COIN and CN was 20.6%, 8.2% and 5.5%, respectively, in prostate plans. CONCLUSION: PQI improved the plan quality discerning power and was capable of discerning qualified and unqualified treatment plans.
Authors: Hans Stabenau; Linda Rivera; Ellen Yorke; Jie Yang; Renzhi Lu; Richard J Radke; Andrew Jackson Journal: Med Phys Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 4.071